Re: [core] draft-bormann-core-links-json: call for adoption

[peter van der Stok <[e-mail]>]

Starts to make sense. So, you partially agree about core-interfaces 
being the base document (informationally or not).
Will other "links-exi" documents then also be based on core-interfaces?
Or do we need still another document?
I mention this need for some generally understood structure beforehand, 
because at the moment writing a document about for example "coap based 
management" takes some thinking about which documents (just from core) 
are relevant and possibly normative.

Greetings,

peter

Carsten Bormann schreef op 2013-05-21 10:40:
> On May 21, 2013, at 09:04, peter van der Stok <[e-mail]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Could the contents of links-json not be combined with 
>> core-interfaces?
> 
> Core-Interfaces is meant as an informational document describing good
> approaches, while links-json actually defines a format.
> 
>> I can imagine that we have other documents defining the json contents 
>> for different management subjects
> 
> Right, but they are on quite different timelines.
> Generally I'd expect all future documents defining a format to define
> the (or a) JSON version, if that is desired.
> links-json just fills in that gap retroactively for 6690.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten