[core] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-stateless-06: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-core-stateless-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-stateless/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. The document is clear, easy to
read and quite useful. The security aspects are also well defined.

Please find below a single non-blocking COMMENT. An answer will be appreciated.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

-- Section 2.1 --
Why does this document update RFC 8323 definition of TKL? At first sight, the
TKL field definitions in this document and in RFC 8323 look identical.