[core] draft-ietf-core-comi-16

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

I did a quick run through core-comi to prepare -16.

Please see https://core-wg.github.io/comi/

I prepared two pull requests:

* sid-file

PR: https://github.com/core-wg/comi/pull/9
Draft: https://core-wg.github.io/comi/sid-file/draft-ietf-core-comi.html
Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=https://core-wg.github.io/comi/draft-ietf-core-comi.txt&url_2=https://core-wg.github.io/comi/sid-file/draft-ietf-core-comi.txt

I reprocessed the sid-file for the yang module manually, in the same way I already did this for core-sid.

* yellow-notes

PR: https://github.com/core-wg/comi/pull/10
Draft: https://core-wg.github.io/comi/yellow-notes/draft-ietf-core-comi.html
Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=https://core-wg.github.io/comi/draft-ietf-core-comi.txt&url_2=https://core-wg.github.io/comi/yellow-notes/draft-ietf-core-comi.txt

A number of editorial fixes; processing remaining yellow notes.

Two of the yellow notes were no longer necessary.

The third yellow pointed to a remaining inconsistency with filtering event streams (notifications):  
These still had a GET with a query parameter that needed to be parsed for decimally encoded SIDs.  
Like the other cases in the document, I now fixed this to use FETCH with an application/yang-identifiers+cbor-seq request payload that contains the SIDs that were in the URI before.
Fewer inconsistencies, less code, fewer bugs.


Please check these two PRs (and the rest of the document, if you can); I plan to submit a -16 on Monday that should go to final WGLC with core-sid.

Grüße, Carsten