Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-yang-cbor-mapping-00
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 27 April 2016 21:17 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2162512D0A6 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBSYsOZZuaQG for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CDD012DC31 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mfilter36-d.gandi.net (mfilter36-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.167]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B4C1720A9; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:17:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter36-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.196]) by mfilter36-d.gandi.net (mfilter36-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EW0Lzwbv0--p; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:17:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 93.199.242.26
Received: from nar-3.local (p5DC7F21A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.242.26]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4EB5172095; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:17:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <57212C66.3010102@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:17:26 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>
References: <570A4583.2030100@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <570A4583.2030100@tzi.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/oktGB2ZVWImHt0hD5K-rDtf88dc>
Subject: Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-yang-cbor-mapping-00
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 21:17:35 -0000
The discussion that spawned from this adoption call is ongoing, but we seem to have converged on (slightly rough*) consensus on adopting this draft as a WG item. Authors: please resubmit the current draft as draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-00.txt; we will start processing further changes in the WG process. (If you already know about technical issues, please use the WG tracker at https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/core/trac/report/9 for now; editorial issues might be tracked easier on github.) Note that the yang-cbor draft is on github in the https://github.com/core-wg/yang-cbor repository (which also contains other drafts that may or may not converge into WG documents). When the renaming is complete, the current editor's copy of the WG draft will be visible at: http://core-wg.github.io/yang-cbor/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-latest.html *) the roughness was about the danger of the CoRE WG overextending itself by taking on more work. This will be actively watched by the chairs, whose priority will continue to be on getting current work finished. However, there is significant new energy in the COMI/COOL work, so the overall capacity of the WG will increase by starting to work on this part of our charter. GrΓΌΓe, Carsten Carsten Bormann wrote: > In Buenos Aires, we discussed the adoption of > draft-veillette-core-yang-cbor-mapping-00 but not enough people had read > the document to go for an in-room consensus call. > > This is a two-week call for adoption of > draft-veillette-core-yang-cbor-mapping-00 as a WG document of CoRE. > Specifically, if you (1) support or (2) have an objection to this > decision, please speak up on the mailing list by 2016-04-24. > > Note that this work is explicitly covered by our charter, so discussions > of which WG should work on this are off-topic. > > As always, adoption of a document as a WG document is not a vote on > whether we already have reached last-call state; the intention is to > work on the WG document after adoption for a while to get it ready for > last call. If you want to combine your support/objection with technical > comments, this is certainly welcome so we can accelerate that process. > > GrΓΌΓe, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > core mailing list > core@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core > >
- Re: [core] LWM2M spec now available for public do⦠Carsten Bormann
- [core] LWM2M spec now available for public downlo⦠Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ peter van der Stok
- [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-yangβ¦ Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Andy Bierman
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Michel Veillette
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Turner, Randy
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ James Nguyen
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Dijk, Esko
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Andy Bierman
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Michel Veillette
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Paul Duffy
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Michel Veillette
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Michel Veillette
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Michel Veillette
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Andy Bierman
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Andy Bierman
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [core] Using Yang to describe LWM2M ... was Re: ?β¦ Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [core] Using Yang to describe LWM2M ... was R⦠Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [core] π WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-β¦ Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] Using Yang to describe LWM2M ... was R⦠Hannes Tschofenig