Re: [core] Fwd: [OPSAWG] some comments and thoughts on mud-sbom and sbom-type
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 28 August 2020 02:05 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB6B3A14DC for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tozqBHLHOUAA for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC79D3A14D9 for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451DD389CF; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 21:44:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qnGHVe5K93qr; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 21:44:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D142389C9; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 21:44:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9A71931; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: "core@ietf.org WG (core@ietf.org)" <core@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <9105A6A0-4C53-4FA1-8E3B-C404417313C0@tzi.org>
References: <D5000591-F39C-42DB-991C-E8BC0F5E5E70@cisco.com> <9105A6A0-4C53-4FA1-8E3B-C404417313C0@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:05:37 -0400
Message-ID: <24738.1598580337@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/pxE3yjl0YdPQfcpzmc0DAfc812Y>
Subject: Re: [core] Fwd: [OPSAWG] some comments and thoughts on mud-sbom and sbom-type
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:05:41 -0000
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > I fished the below out of conversation in opsawg. > The objective is to say “here, but with coaps:// scheme”. Yup. > We can say “with the current scheme, but elsewhere” as > //elsewhere.example/.well-known/sbom > But we can’t say > coaps:///.well-known/sbom > out of a resource accessed with coap:// Maybe you have a suggestion. rfc6570 has been suggested. > Food for thought. > (I know, use CoRAL :-) Could we easily, in a YANG module? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [core] Fwd: [OPSAWG] some comments and thoughts o… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] Fwd: [OPSAWG] some comments and though… Michael Richardson