IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] Chairs' review of draft-ietf-core-stateless-03.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Sat, 02 November 2019 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C55C1200C4 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 13:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WOpX422AgGxW for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 13:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C3BE12020A for <core@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 13:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDCB3897A; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 16:07:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA8F71D; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 16:09:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>
cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Core WG mailing list <core@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <27A826D9-5F28-4044-BE61-E7CD1C05EA90@arm.com>
References: <157237477119.11043.4363082013315464920@ietfa.amsl.com> <F964F5EF-96F7-49EC-BECB-0604B16F31FF@tzi.org> <27A826D9-5F28-4044-BE61-E7CD1C05EA90@arm.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <912.1572725390.1@localhost>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 16:09:50 -0400
Message-ID: <913.1572725390@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/rtRyNDQCcCsvKh5PXurp6SE5JNs>
Subject: Re: [core] Chairs' review of draft-ietf-core-stateless-03.txt
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 20:09:53 -0000

Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com> wrote:
    > Quibbles aside, the document recommends CCM -- over other AEAD
    > constructions -- and does so consciously, I think, to provide the best
    > trade-off between overall security, wire efficiency and processing cost.

... because CCM is most likely to be available accelerated in small devices?

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email