Re: [core] multipart/core
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 06 June 2018 14:44 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C24D130F4D for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 07:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Mri5DjVyxEZ for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 07:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50474130DCA for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 07:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1528296259; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=lzeW+wapTFRkzVRNH4r/6Avj7fGdxohhrfPX1Oe93dY=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=JkmghiUJ9UX+brVj86LiCzxTVx8TtNf0TrSFI+X2mrFy3TgFm45TeqRLiRAUY4GcvvaSjq uINBCHSWucXpVL8fTwX/b/2J4dmJ9MMt37mxxu7DNtGbOZQZsIeNWoRqoNuBbUDCvcUaea yEGsqQHY8C5aRJJriOcXf8ZahM/e9PE=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <WxfzQwBcJh-d@statler.isode.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 15:44:19 +0100
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, peter van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, core <core@ietf.org>
References: <ba113ac028c50ee08625d508a89bb169@bbhmail.nl> <CAAzbHvYRgHsSOMgYSxvQOsbZVjnCO+h2r=2LV4vS5a2yJ1s=bA@mail.gmail.com> <20273.1527881373@localhost> <CAAzbHvagy43fX2VDOrG2MzFzfV1-bsE+b7t4GkkU=1wRiiGiJA@mail.gmail.com> <5727.1528220965@localhost> <4AEB441B-CCE5-49B7-8F42-4D0BC8381BA3@ericsson.com> <b0e5e09f1aeff2f553c244013486fbab@bbhmail.nl> <F61A4181-E14F-4B58-8A0B-FE3EA30C3D09@tzi.org>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <1677921f-3c58-9aa4-747f-89b6a4297f52@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 15:44:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
In-Reply-To: <F61A4181-E14F-4B58-8A0B-FE3EA30C3D09@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/t8Ao58ZUN7zRkKhaN-mO7MzHNpY>
Subject: Re: [core] multipart/core
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 14:44:23 -0000
Hi, I would like to quickly insert AD interrupt. I had a quick look at draft-fossati-core-multipart-ct-04 and I think the proposed definition of multipart/core is syntactically incompatible with MIME. Please read sections 5.1 and 5.1.1 of RFC 2046. In particular, all multipart media types have to use syntax specified in RFC 2046, which this proposal violates. To be clear, I am not against registering a media type which uses CBOR syntax for a collection of other media types. However this media type name can't use the "multipart" top level media type. You can either define a new "application" media type (e.g. application/multipart-core) or you can define a new top level media type different from "multipart". The process for definining a new top level media type is slightly more comlicated, so you should evaluate whether you want to do this. Best Regards, Alexey
- Re: [core] 🔔 WGA multipart/core Jaime Jiménez
- Re: [core] 🔔 WGA multipart/core Shahid Raza
- Re: [core] 🔔 WGA multipart/core Christian Amsüss
- Re: [core] 🔔 WGA multipart/core Alexander Pelov
- Re: [core] 🔔 WGA multipart/core Alexander Pelov
- Re: [core] 🔔 WGA multipart/core Klaus Hartke
- Re: [core] 🔔 WGA multipart/core Kovatsch, Matthias
- Re: [core] 🔔 WGA multipart/core Padmakumar Subramani
- Re: [core] multipart/core Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] multipart/core Peter van der Stok
- Re: [core] multipart/core Jaime Jiménez
- Re: [core] multipart/core Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] multipart/core Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [core] multipart/core Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge)
- Re: [core] multipart/core Peter van der Stok
- Re: [core] multipart/core Klaus Hartke
- Re: [core] multipart/core Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] multipart/core Michael Richardson
- Re: [core] multipart/core Michael Richardson
- Re: [core] multipart/core Jaime Jiménez
- Re: [core] multipart/core Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] 🔔 WGA multipart/core Peter van der Stok
- [core] 🔔 WGA multipart/core Jaime Jiménez
- [core] multipart/core Michael Richardson