[core] Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-core-coap-pubsub

Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> Thu, 25 June 2026 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
X-Original-To: core@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: core@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AC710725A8B for <core@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 03:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1782382158; bh=orQv+rS8HEavEeLaQMqxnBJtar0GK0IUOO3QulrX2nc=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=cEfFWJZbweRlwYf0SnkUHvPDatR+qw1x4xkSN8aLisSLjkJqlpqwf+lPN850wZi5h Sjz2Qv3/LFvgGo9nSRi9y3bMHi4Mp4VStOsK4jm8eJ9o01mjPIr3yZKIGlTEFryJuH uVO6pZwyoty+2dBh7V8vZvQZLUwL0/TTPtk1iWaM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iotconsultancy.nl
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h2irUrqQGr7f for <core@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 03:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dane.soverin.net (dane.soverin.net [185.233.34.30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF7510725A84 for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 03:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.4.100]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gmDzx4417z17d for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:09:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.100]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4gmDzx1xZPzKB for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:09:17 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.soverin.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=iotconsultancy.nl header.i=@iotconsultancy.nl header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=soverin1 header.b=lq6fSaRq; dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iotconsultancy.nl; s=soverin1; t=1782382157; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=N/XYiUV+jN5NuF6SOa3MKzpaTpkmCAPBlr9q0loGfVk=; b=lq6fSaRq42GSTuz784pcQtsyuuS/yoxVET5Hqx9GcHBGmfbEQnCfuuLH31wJ0VvaCU/YdV qaF+t3Bh03PTKDRvAvmP3FPKok0xHgbiQF86YJSxUqupx03uBbqB9PIzuCCWg78gKRVa+t SSv2rdcE84ToVBwS1LzLjB+PUeaybLHPenfl0C0ArVrTZdI+BI62QGm2y7yvodPneuO9lb sLfdohXRmWwWpj/bloANAR1pcNN83rNEhUCn5tv7dfAjksz+irjpPjk5X4jM/HQtHGeQsk 2e750H9vG4NyH0un6PK2S1/mzElWhtuFr6C/7MRz5xh3Ak3GcPlQQsgFW1Du6w==
X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfKmDduOAw04BzA9YrIcMC0Vm9JbZWhdfD3/qz1oNk1vUnkEp1xPxiN1VMMD6W5m3CntX80wLrWjGTORZYW6/HCJ6AGR2dv1TOqeFh32X+mIJwUs8I5PH LUY8gR+T9IIejvDranSeHEB8IY1XqTJh//+marVOxh7xza2EWar104QSD4sY9ZolsjW2UKOMvcm4RAvsC6w9nsd0fHM+kBr8lviYZX2J3jBGIdz1vw5J8uYh c/BUahyiX0WuIr4N8AWpZlTbaoASZGmc2b7IlBu1+eOkCcTT28POx3OFLfEkX3+Ey/gqVVx1FRaGGFJTIyN+4g==
X-Soverin-Id: 019efe41-5cc8-7872-94cc-9569fcd67f3e
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------d4qxXXoUPbx0l4bSER22JvOU"
Message-ID: <9b753633-9f2c-4902-b975-a9f95e6efe46@iotconsultancy.nl>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:09:17 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: core <core@ietf.org>
References: <4e3e7e50-5494-466d-b207-b07f3a98c120@iotconsultancy.nl>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
Organization: IoTconsultancy.nl
In-Reply-To: <4e3e7e50-5494-466d-b207-b07f3a98c120@iotconsultancy.nl>
X-Spampanel-Class: ham
Message-ID-Hash: 4N6QJU2MGXXOI26LE3VEZPZAGEFMKMHF
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4N6QJU2MGXXOI26LE3VEZPZAGEFMKMHF
X-MailFrom: esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-core.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [core] Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-core-coap-pubsub
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/tw-GVCatpqP-tkk8GB5xSTmlN1g>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:core-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:core-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:core-leave@ietf.org>

(replying with my hat on as WG member and someone being listed in 
Acknowledgements:)

I'm not personally aware of any patent claims that would read on this 
specification.

Esko


On 6/25/26 11:30, Esko Dijk wrote:
> (Note: this message is reusing text from an earlier poll from Marco - 
> I'll take the liberty to reuse, thanks. I might even have a license 
> from IETF Trust to do so :) )
> Dear all,
>
> I am sending this message as an IPR poll for the document 
> draft-ietf-core-coap-pubsub of which I am the Shepherd.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-pubsub
>
> As you all know, there are certain requirements about declaring patent 
> claims (called "IPR" in IETF lingo) that you are personally aware of 
> and that apply to a contribution (another IETF term) you make to the IETF.
>
> These requirements do not change with IESG submission of a document, 
> but that milestone provides a convenient check point, particularly for 
> all authors and contributors listed, to indicate that such "IPR 
> declarations" have been made as required, or possibly an assertion 
> that you are not personally aware of patent claims that would "read" 
> on that document. Note that this is about what you personally know, 
> not about needing to consult your employer's corporate lawyers to 
> state a legal opinion.
>
> So: If you are **personally aware of any patent claims** that might 
> apply to systems that implement this draft, please review BCP 78 [1] 
> and BCP 79 [2] and make any appropriate IPR declaration now. If you 
> are not sure whether you need to make a declaration or not, please 
> talk to the chairs (core-chairs@ietf.org)
>
> **If you are an author or listed contributor** and do not know about a 
> pertinent patent claim (granted or in processing), please simply do a 
> wide reply to this message and state:
>
> "I am not personally aware of any patent claims that would read on 
> this specification."
>
> (Creating the Shepherd write-up is blocking on the authors' responses.)
>
> Best regards,
> Esko Dijk
>
> [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5378.html
>
> [2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8179.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list --core@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email tocore-leave@ietf.org
-- 
*IoTconsultancy.nl* | Email/Teams: esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl | +31 6 
2385 8339