Re: [core] CoRE@IETF100: Summary

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Mon, 20 November 2017 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016D2129541 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 04:55:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8N2Mc29lDPv9 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 04:55:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632531201F8 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 04:55:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.91.210] ([80.92.119.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4Gup-1f75LC0KtX-00rslU; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:55:09 +0100
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, core <core@ietf.org>
References: <07B87C8C-FBE3-44E2-8EB7-F25F580ED0B4@tzi.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <921e381d-80e6-8fc9-3350-c827368998cc@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:55:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <07B87C8C-FBE3-44E2-8EB7-F25F580ED0B4@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:VNlYgG3jwG5MMouRU679xQpet1ytrpq65ObLoPGcViXIac8OIo9 pJUMwdyx/x8uFfFJfENmT5DjjfbCPkSZwY6ygo9Ls7rm9mqj+/Rr1ij6aPrq2QZzrESX5OG ynfCC9tde5AxS3YxH6pkb9Z1RkOZPxK4tgZA3fvGN1y8SRyDvVzpPVNSjgxVGwX4AzO8tqR KtbBl4efcg8muO1YkhahQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:yCSBZ5iYwgY=:NCDf91/7eUq2txkivQotjU gRVPmpAKL3DHmj57Kig4l8zHrCvbHDP4fva2Kyo8wONHyMGPddYDEK0PNs6TVnM2Wi9Paptfo FJzaX6vlvtdlYzBFFkQHWW2G3G3B8+szOwammulS+D94TCme3t4FmBHQPWPPZ5ZAMuPMA6SL0 kE4Mq+jFzPFOahq/idldIHQhv0TfFEWaB+rX1lIL/LiB5PMfrZMWmeX9ZrIbarU42K3z788Em EpdwkqgXzHz5+hx1CAhQAgmdo/ZCau5k0FjKAp4TVQtWXl91ijk5Mpa8EauLzTaBEa4zN9Q54 kHKn2vlxycyyXwYIfQBzW9oY2ipGXqYLdfyYt7fTeeTCo5Vms2Vo3wXJSayX6tp4etGbry/XC EyomGgnJ18FwQZkoG3tkbSlYylGCC2VChYS+PfonNi/dcjfzvIT6IigqatnWhYuWbJ1VW4p71 1HQkJuearnjQwQ3dMxC+3cuIFXeifCmKeVE05lFAl+nAbwxsObL8z/Pd/CiQSCPhSIL21Cd7Y Xsv9Of+Cf18HNWBA+LY/FUedS1OTCHvp8WngF9qzRRPzskC4RDk9+VOntolvcmrYnDxY+Mub+ 2rp4QmbOENxCxQMYZaYf38owOP/0LjAtqDT9zkbsa+Br+OfCIsuXPDoEcR6mct7PLADsnCIHG YCT3UtPI8VHGvf+Y2sG56ux19g6SPSWborO4Pv8M3DmftU4Z7V5XP3bWaoxiUwQvFDNIg8H7V Pujo1G7/2qMwVM/awxbjJf2yH4eCW+FazlQOqsJq2gv3gtjlnY3Naj1jvrt3DkQ8Q/a0ZjEoc phZK24AOtlZzDbwzkr6uJqAnQBv8arxe1+Z0C2UHDjDsskaJoc=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/vbUVmUfS-i0NHvPfu-Jxwjujn7A>
Subject: Re: [core] CoRE@IETF100: Summary
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:55:20 -0000

Hi Carsten, Hi Jaime,

On 11/17/2017 06:45 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> ## In IESG processing
> 
> * draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls is in IESG processing, waiting for
>   Mirja's DISCUSS to clear [it is now clear that this will be in
>   December after her vacation]. 

It is unfortunate that she went on vacation without clearing her DISCUSS
during the IETF week, which means that we will not be able to finalize
the document before xmas as anticipated during the CORE WG session @
IETF#100.

 The first interop on Saturday had 2.5
>   implementations (libcoap, augustcellars, and coap.me), with a CoAP
>   GET performed on /.well-known/core (which exercises a lot of the
>   machinery already).  Editorial input from the interop should lead to
>   a -11 soon.

Is there a write-up about the interop testing available? What exactly
was tested? Is the code available as open source, maybe in a dedicated
branch? Could we plan to do another online test in December?

I guess the 2.5 implementations refer to two client & server
implementations plus one client or server implementation? Is that correct?

Ciao
Hannes