Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-yang-cbor-mapping-00

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 24 April 2016 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5182012B01E for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 12:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8fwlLxvF8_2l for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 12:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB8A512B00D for <core@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 12:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mfilter35-d.gandi.net (mfilter35-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.166]) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF77C5A50; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 21:28:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter35-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.194]) by mfilter35-d.gandi.net (mfilter35-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vAiErADkNtzo; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 21:28:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 93.199.242.26
Received: from nar-3.local (p5DC7F21A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.242.26]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46B96C5A5D; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 21:28:37 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <571D1E63.9090003@tzi.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 21:28:35 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
References: <570A4583.2030100@tzi.org> <5718A09E.7040607@gmx.net> <BLUPR06MB1763F3B6BDE5240402576758FE6E0@BLUPR06MB1763.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <20160421174806.GA8710@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20160421174806.GA8710@elstar.local>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/vj2lMqZQWxIp3Zh4BiLC48Miqfg>
Cc: "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] ? WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-yang-cbor-mapping-00
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:28:43 -0000

Hi Juergen,

trying to read your message -- are you just commenting on the side
conversation here or is this also a comment on the adoption call?

Grüße, Carsten


Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 05:34:50PM +0000, Michel Veillette wrote:
>> First, LWM2M have its own modeling language encoded in xml.
>> A file like "OMA-SUP-XML_LWM2M_Security-V1_0-20131210-C" is not fundamentally different than something than can be named security.yang.
>> A simple xml transform can probably do the conversion between the two without any lost.
>> LWM2M just have a simpler (subset) modeling language.
>>
> 
> These are pretty bold statements. Claiming something is simple and
> knowing something is simple are sometimes different things. Have you
> worked throught the details? Is there a decent public definition of
> the 'simpler (subset) modeling language'? And with public I mean
> public, not hidden behind all sorts of registration walls.
> 
> /js
>