Re: [COSE] [IANA #1284212] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers (cose)

[Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>]

Hi David, Mike,

Carsten and I have been talking offline: we believe this is an improvement, but we still have some comments and edits to suggest. I believe Carsten will be sending something soon.

Thanks for your patience,
Francesca

From: David Dong via RT <[e-mail]>
Date: Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 18:57
To:
Cc: Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: [IANA #1284212] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers (cose)
Hi Francesca and Carsten,

Following up again on this; could you let us know if this COSE Header Parameters registration can now be approved?

This document is on the agenda for the November 30 IESG telechat; thank you.

Best regards,

David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist

On Wed Nov 22 01:08:44 2023, david.dong wrote:
> Hi Francesca and Carsten,
>
> Following up on this; please let us know if this COSE Header
> Parameters registration can be now approved.
>
> This document is on the telechat agenda for November 30th; thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David Dong
> IANA Services Sr. Specialist
>
> On Tue Nov 14 18:10:17 2023, [e-mail] wrote:
> > Hi Francesca,
> >
> > Now that we have an agreed-upon strategy in which the lake-edhoc and
> > draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers header parameters are distinct,
> > can you please reply-all updating your review to approve the
> > registration?  That should put us in good shape for the November 30th
> > Telechat.
> >
> > FYI, Hannes replied updating his IoTDir review saying that the spec
> > is
> > ready - which he did in response to the security considerations
> > updates we made together in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-
> > ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers-09.html.
> >
> > Carsten, in response to your feedback, -09 now also says that the
> > profile used defines the semantics for the CWT claims used.
> >
> > Thanks both,
> > -- Mike
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: COSE <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Michael Jones
> > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 3:54 AM
> > To: Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>;
> > [e-mail]; lgl island-resort.com <[e-mail]>;
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: Re: [COSE] [IANA #1284212] expert review for draft-ietf-
> > cose-
> > cwt-claims-in-headers (cose)
> >
> > I created https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-2dc2a496cddc8548&q=1&e=76acdd3e-7afd-47af-aa45-dee8e71504d3&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftplooker%2Fdraft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-
> > headers/pull/13 to describe the non-CBOR payload use case in response
> > to Hannes' IotDir review.  It also says that profiles define the
> > semantics of the claims used, in response to further feedback from
> > Carsten.
> >
> > Reviews requested!
> >
> > -- Mike
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 11:46 AM
> > To: Michael Jones <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>;
> > [e-mail]; lgl island-resort.com <[e-mail]>;
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: Re: [COSE] [IANA #1284212] expert review for draft-ietf-
> > cose-
> > cwt-claims-in-headers (cose)
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I was planning to send you (a PR with) some clarifying editorial
> > changes first.
> > The week is quite full...
> >
> > Grüße, Carsten
> >
> >
> > > On Nov 8, 2023, at 00:29, Michael Jones
> > > <[e-mail]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > As designated experts, can you please reply-all saying that you
> > > approve of the registration proposed in
> > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-
> > > headers-08.html
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > COSE mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose