IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [COSE] AD review of draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-08 — DIFF CHECK

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 14 May 2020 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D193A0D27; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q0DI_vQQyAYk; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB6B33A08E3; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-pool2-383.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-pool2-383.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.49.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49NP401gnKzyXt; Thu, 14 May 2020 22:57:04 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <018701d62951$84539bd0$8cfad370$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 22:57:03 +0200
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct.all@ietf.org, cose@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 611182623.229411-7407bd5ae541d36574cf0c3d3915374a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D99E49F6-50EC-47B7-A39E-433E405E83E9@tzi.org>
References: <CALaySJLUNpkiu4qj4YXaycBqFSdQ1hn11u1mYkZPve8kr3CHRQ@mail.gmail.com> <018701d62951$84539bd0$8cfad370$@augustcellars.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/7oESt1emN9DgWqrh7SuclA2TIeQ>
Subject: Re: [COSE] AD review of draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-08 — DIFF CHECK
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 20:57:10 -0000

On 2020-05-13, at 20:08, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:
> 
> “counter signature” or “countersignature”. 
> [JLS] Given that 8152 used two words, I made a pass to make it two words here as well.

My dictionary does not agree.

Neither does Wikipedia or Wiktionary:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countersign_(legal)
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/countersignature

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email