[COSE] Call for Consensus: Begin Recharter of COSE WG

Joel Höglund <joel.hoglund@gmail.com> Fri, 17 April 2020 07:31 UTC

Return-Path: <joel.hoglund@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C1B3A0F51 for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ahrlTkAvM26W for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B063A0D89 for <cose@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id j20so749124edj.0 for <cose@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=33Nl1m4GLNE3hjP9cmrjarns0Mp7vdlXDnIeTmYAhzU=; b=pPkqZDnjdC3rXWBkXB1xUQAiselo8HRA15f2nhiuXnaXXny9sFkhQ5AiGZej1yvVK2 WWWlxHjHrLMDYUs1i3a0hIfiEniktTLcW/+C1r9wsMLtu8GmWUtKcl51AifzoZQpgI9g bYVtLJuq+AA3jPOfw6Rnisprza5Jbm9AhORluFPqhc3CYk8PuVXybGCohHTrGDqTNjDr j0guYW4QXZlNLwdDYuTQzs4WLoCgdtKq4pBMOLeR7DS0F/FPKpeBl4J9T0ZsCvUzL5QP R0kv3dfiJzwo+Y9Z6H5CW2GrPhpuLa5PNLYUxoqLhMsdh4uYS+9SkgwDhGIrFI9rP2ej e/3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=33Nl1m4GLNE3hjP9cmrjarns0Mp7vdlXDnIeTmYAhzU=; b=kb+CIk/0x+45m0EDN3V8bxJmZY9IohmOIkbmNgx/Qhd89babzP9m6b7qILbDavKBw8 Kd4nmntO3qH3TxEcirpyOuBrxl3XjvYYadtN/QiO4agaSDKOlkNY+yGe303Wxjqi2odK 84n1PfbWxmfaJAlwiUm3ujPzxdKZN1XFU4AeE2J/voEYxOk91z4N/Y5qGpaNQa3ww8m/ gzoWJ0SULobzoImv/DICya8C75n/hvK9BM304DvVQLlAcsv1zOtsfHUPP3cMqWmxtyC5 nbUd8EhFA1JdTqHPIbVkyq3nf9njIkp3Pmu9g0lfVdsReY6STdVvkHE4Lwg516qD4NcW ud1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZXMzNyOokqujMXkZKWu5sn8pz+FIb8HnqyK3OaouWdmGXH+vbP ovWjGOtMPdZpPrOecUNPBLrufTwXop0sR6nAml/EfL8j7r0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL5RV5FpBPZXZH/t2iXXY8WrXl0jlsgUyHnQArp6UQRQanCIeVziuSF6PstpC9y8LYo0VQPH3UabeffbEgFQDw=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:c25a:: with SMTP id t26mr1698908edf.20.1587108649487; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Joel_H=C3=B6glund?= <joel.hoglund@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:30:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHszGEK59FACYOoS=-6Up5pw1L9m0c1ZRHHTrN+Ov+vNGOrH5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: cose@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045d2e705a3778781"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/AP-hBCrGctouaupJRPbtSPyqsqE>
Subject: [COSE] Call for Consensus: Begin Recharter of COSE WG
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:31:04 -0000

Hi all,

I support the charter, with the addition/comment below made by John
Mattsson about also keeping the RFC 7925 profile, as it is relevant for the
IoT scenarios we are working on.

Best Regards

Joel Höglund

>> I just learned that IETF 6TiSCH is relying on IEEE 802.11AR profiled
X.509
>> certificates instead of RFC 7925 profiled X.509 certificates. It might
be that the
>> CBOR compression should support both. This could be done with small
>> additions as the profiles are quite similar. I think the charter should
leave the
>> scope a bit more open on this point.