Re: [COSE] "CBOR Certificates"

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 12 February 2021 08:39 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A803A141C for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:39:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KMp-_4Ar60Js for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F7533A1418 for <cose@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.152] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DcRkP2XNszyXV; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:39:24 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1984ED32-F628-4DF8-AF7D-521CBBB680C2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <B8DE7623-B2D2-48EE-A832-626058268EDB@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:39:11 +0100
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "cose@ietf.org" <cose@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <9C0BCC7F-6245-4EE7-8C42-7971D9A8A701@tzi.org>
References: <5C2A6065-AC5E-4702-A94D-F72C85BD6DAC@ericsson.com> <452ddae14b19ac8a6b98cdbbb20edede@bbhmail.nl> <4c5a7de2-e855-3bb7-cc6d-abfaa86c09dd@ri.se> <d197e8c500c7f1b284c74f3d25985df845d722c2.camel@aisec.fraunhofer.de> <2214.1613079564@localhost> <B8DE7623-B2D2-48EE-A832-626058268EDB@ericsson.com>
To: Göran Selander <goran.selander=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/D8BebxQaPluEkvbeHpdnLscadzM>
Subject: Re: [COSE] "CBOR Certificates"
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:39:32 -0000

On 12. Feb 2021, at 08:36, Göran Selander <goran.selander=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>  "CBOR certificate"  (shorthand for "CBOR encoded X.509 certificate”)

I’m still hoping that we will, at some point, have “CBOR encoded modern certificates” as well, so I’m not sure I like this shorthand.
We will have a hard time controlling what people will call these things, so being upfront about the naming will be really useful.

Grüße, Carsten