[COSE] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-09: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-hash-envelope/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done in this document. I have some comments about

### Section 5.1

`the algorithm SHOULD be registered in the IANA COSE Algorithms registry, and
should be distinguishable from non-pre hash variants that may also be present.`

Is there any reason why the first SHOULD is marked as BCP14 and not the second
one ?

In which case can the first SHOULD be ignored ?

Please provide a URI for the "IANA COSE Algorithms registry"