Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: Placement of CDDL
Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Tue, 17 November 2015 23:11 UTC
Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656181A89F6 for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:11:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.053
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.543, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jpJpmaVsFHVO for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:11:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 073EE1A89F2 for <cose@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:11:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E3FE2038; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:11:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07651-10; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:11:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from securerf.ihtfp.org (205.158.164.101.ptr.us.xo.net [205.158.164.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mocana.ihtfp.org", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08FC0E2035; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:11:49 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ihtfp.com; s=default; t=1447801910; bh=Qx533aFgci9Si32te+Ozs4lJUfkDI9uXouBbUNgd6E0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=HYO1gqWuue/5U1FMT1p2ZaWOMaFyEyDhSRhPSrfqzs32A+Sdq6k47QUIjGYR7Is3W fjM7lbS4s7/gTsmxG4D0BO4JAoZuR+ruwUQd+ervuce/s6gqb5m7Oi9Civk3B+qkgM JFZoT9SkZaFU8G782ItU6MHI26n6PHreZMKwkeAM=
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by securerf.ihtfp.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id tAHH1xiZ013797; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:01:59 -0500
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Justin Richer <jricher@MIT.EDU>
References: <8A64429C-0F3F-4257-A9D8-066B8070A036@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:01:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8A64429C-0F3F-4257-A9D8-066B8070A036@mit.edu> (Justin Richer's message of "Sat, 7 Nov 2015 17:02:07 +0900")
Message-ID: <sjm6110lfug.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/YRa0UEdLa4AmJOhfVzgU1lNNLKo>
Cc: cose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: Placement of CDDL
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:11:54 -0000
I feel the CDDL should be inline with the normative text alongside other examples (B). -derek Justin Richer <jricher@MIT.EDU> writes: > At the Yokohama meeting, the chairs agreed to do a consensus call > regarding the placement of the CDDL formatted text within the messages > draft. The four positions we are asking the working group to consider > and voice their support for are: > > A) Place the CDDL at the end of the document in an appendix. Other > examples will remain inline. > B) Place the CDDL inline with the normative text alongside other examples. > C) You need more information to decide. > D) You don’t give a flying rat about CDDL.* > > Note that this proposal does NOT consider removal of CDDL or > declaration of normative dependence on CDDL. The English text will > remain the normative form and the CDDL will remain a non-normative > example. The (unfinished, unhomed) CDDL draft will remain an > informative reference. > > The consensus call will remain open for two weeks from today, closing > on November 21, 2015; at which time, hopefully we will have a clear > answer and direction for our editor. > > Thank you, > — Justin & Kepeng, your COSE chairs > > * I promised those in the room at Yokohama to offer a flying rat > option, for which I am deeply sorry. > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: Placement of CDDL Matt Miller (mamille2)
- [COSE] Consensus Call: Placement of CDDL Justin Richer
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: Placement of CDDL Brian Campbell
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: Placement of CDDL Nat Sakimura
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: Placement of CDDL Mike Jones
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: Placement of CDDL Derek Atkins
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: Placement of CDDL Justin Richer