[COSE] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 09 June 2020 02:08 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: cose@ietf.org
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9CB3A0924; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 19:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct@ietf.org, cose-chairs@ietf.org, cose@ietf.org, Matthew Miller <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net>, linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.3.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <159166848640.5501.9902316470501703521@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 19:08:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/c2IE8683FjR--0B_KPWoZqOqiYI>
Subject: [COSE] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 02:08:07 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-10: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Are the wrong data structures being referenced or did I misunderstand something? ** Section 5. Per “Abbreviated counter signatures use the structure COSE_Countersign1”, this doesn’t seem consistent with the more detailed write-up in Section 5.2 which says that “The byte string representing the signature value is placed in the CounterSignature0 attribute”. The document makes no other reference to COSE_Countersign1. The shepherd write-up notes that ‘one item to note is the decision to keep the context string "COSE_Countersign1" for abbreviated countersignatures’. However, I found no such reference in Step 1 of Section 4.4 (page 22) which enumerated the possible strings. ** What is the intended name of the structure for the Counter Signature -- is it COSE_Countersignature or COSE_Countersign? -- Table 1, Section 2, Section 4.4 and Section 5.1 (to include the CDDL) reference COSE_Countersignature but -- Section 5. Per “Full counter signatures use the structure COSE_Countersign …” -- Section 5.1. Per “A tagged COSE_Countersign structure …” ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for making an easy to read and compare bis document. ** Section 4.4. Per the the following item in the list, ‘"CounterSignature" for signatures used as counter signature attributes.’, can this be more precisely stated as to reference the particular COSE_* data type? The other items in this list are more precise in naming the corresponding structure/attributes.
- [COSE] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-cose… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [COSE] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Jim Schaad
- Re: [COSE] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [COSE] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Jim Schaad
- Re: [COSE] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Roman Danyliw