Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5
Ludwig Seitz <ludwig@sics.se> Mon, 09 November 2015 09:28 UTC
Return-Path: <ludwig@sics.se>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7EB1B7B1E for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:28:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i5_5YBb8Rgch for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32E841B7B1C for <cose@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 01:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lfdo63 with SMTP id o63so5085795lfd.2 for <cose@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 01:28:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sics_se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=DYoQZsVTI48R9tfd7lhMLSSitsax6DwSvBxrNRcvV8I=; b=YckQf4piqQx+uGng4snmMh8prCXNh8rW08aIVCg99i0ZaQC6opxPDClUW2oY9TIFcF 03zwVWnzYRVp3CENmu/06n7PW/84+LMFsmlXapus1u9foWNehGarOOkxOIKlZb/kenUP D08S4LS9FUK6/Bygj9PalOpB+mzp2xyp96wMSKJ6YGzb9hy4h2pIMkJyWEPzC/4fKEsX p8BJpRu9V6i2bcj9ylBSsETKj3lmHppgRphPm5ZdbQb7sPkvbc/aV4stKiBIM0z6YIzM Q/WOWlw+moJ3xy0lvYdAGlXY5wfZFrG9Gg0x2f8IHBFNwZSLxBUZJQGJJD1ThqpjuGTp Supw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=DYoQZsVTI48R9tfd7lhMLSSitsax6DwSvBxrNRcvV8I=; b=Gg+QpmE5mGW0T9cmk0swflQPuYcsZhmxgIBnLSs7QHW9aoFJppihV4t6JUJJWWvqad vuTZ6KsAw/j9FxOBBL+lKe5qugL5SvzwT0lxB081Kko3vtGvN9Y59BNP/CPgbwCdzXNM GL+NGLDESGaeBxrZJRWwjc7irzOK9qlq7G4C5dr8/P+NITuRlXp5ysDxzF63lRpc4buA kXJE92CMptvBfLzTM5YbDTL/Rz0lSxdXBrLq/nmN4tusE17RnCnAer234tANwGr2Z9Ld zd1H/j+8FcBfh03jLLHH0b9Dc6q+4AObnYueUdJM1T4IBVopD9nx0CtJGHdG/ZdfBv6V xAzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkEU1BS/+GYXY6J8Q3docd00v3oey6gWXYnQSRLMx/fazRELW8S/eC3TPoeKIl2JmKTBI2l
X-Received: by 10.25.167.2 with SMTP id q2mr8627303lfe.15.1447061333218; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 01:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.108] ([85.235.11.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c7sm2223204lfe.22.2015.11.09.01.28.52 for <cose@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 01:28:52 -0800 (PST)
To: cose@ietf.org
References: <D4508FC8-FD8C-4389-BE70-6775E7A1B635@mit.edu>
From: Ludwig Seitz <ludwig@sics.se>
Message-ID: <56406754.70103@sics.se>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:28:52 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D4508FC8-FD8C-4389-BE70-6775E7A1B635@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms040207020502090701040906"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/ggtnx1FvzdspsqRAi34NhY09JiE>
Subject: Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 09:28:57 -0000
On 2015-11-07 09:01, Justin Richer wrote: > At the Yokohama meeting, the chairs agreed to do a consensus call > regarding the definition of RSA 1.5 algorithms within the messages > draft or an auxiliary draft. This functionality is analogous to the > RS* series of signature methods in JWS and the RSA1_5 encryption > method in JWE. The five positions we are asking the working group to > consider and voice their support for are: > A) Drop all support for RSA 1.5 signatures and encryption. > B) Define RSA 1.5 support in an auxiliary draft. > C) Define RSA 1.5 support in the main draft (note that this option > waspreviously discussed on the list and did not find favor at the time, so > if you want it back you’ll need to make a strong case). > D) You need more information to decide. > E) You don’t give a flying rat about RSA 1.5.* A.) /Ludwig -- Ludwig Seitz, PhD SICS Swedish ICT AB Ideon Science Park Building Beta 2 Scheelevägen 17 SE-223 70 Lund Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51 http://www.sics.se
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5 Chuck Mortimore
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5 Matt Miller (mamille2)
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5 Jim Schaad
- [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5 Justin Richer
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5 Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5 Brian Campbell
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5 Nat Sakimura
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5 Mike Jones
- Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: RSA 1.5 Justin Richer