Re: [COSE] STD 96, RFC 9052 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Structures and Process

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 31 August 2022 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618D0C14CE33 for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D5U0p0-9cPyy for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBE73C1522A8 for <cose@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5089abf5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.171.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MHX3f58w5zDCcb; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 06:57:34 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220830232739.CEF754C29A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 06:57:34 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <28496732-823C-47F3-AFB0-E7C75D8E156F@tzi.org>
References: <20220830232739.CEF754C29A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: cose <cose@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/sYvGrbEfOk13kDniHk9SBIfGIHk>
Subject: Re: [COSE] STD 96, RFC 9052 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Structures and Process
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 04:57:44 -0000

Congratulations to the WG for achieving this milestone (RFC 9052, 9053, 9054)!

Kudos to everyone who helped make this happen.
Specific thanks to Ben Kaduk for carrying this over the finish line.

And, first of all, eternal gratitude to Jim Schaad for having the vision to create this standard and the persistence and meticulousness to develop it to what it is today.

Grüße, Carsten


> On 31. Aug 2022, at 01:27, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
>        STD 96        
>        RFC 9052
> 
>        Title:      CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE):
>                    Structures and Process 
>        Author:     J. Schaad
>        Status:     Standards Track
>        Stream:     IETF
>        Date:       August 2022
>        Pages:      66
>        Obsoletes:  RFC 8152
>        See Also:   STD 96
> 
>        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-15.txt
> 
>        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9052
> 
>        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9052
> 
> Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is a data format designed
> for small code size and small message size.  There is a need to be
> able to define basic security services for this data format.  This
> document defines the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)
> protocol.  This specification describes how to create and process
> signatures, message authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR
> for serialization.  This specification additionally describes how to
> represent cryptographic keys using CBOR.  
> 
> This document, along with RFC 9053, obsoletes RFC 8152.
> 
> This document is a product of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> This is now an Internet Standard.
> 
> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
> protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
> for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
> Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
> standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
> memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
> 
> _______________________________________________
> COSE mailing list
> COSE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose