IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [COSE] Proposed charter update

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Fri, 25 September 2020 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7A83A0967 for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K5e_W_KnBiiD for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63C13A0966 for <cose@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.96.106.215) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:05:11 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Carsten Bormann' <cabo@tzi.org>, 'Göran Selander' <goran.selander=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: cose@ietf.org
References: <AAEFFA7E-B4B5-495E-A578-BDC0383A9A76@ericsson.com> <015a01d6935d$8519f200$8f4dd600$@augustcellars.com> <1B5CDEEB-2114-484A-8FEE-213AF3A509A3@ericsson.com> <DE13FEFF-EA7D-4BD9-9821-CE65FC042482@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <DE13FEFF-EA7D-4BD9-9821-CE65FC042482@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:05:07 -0700
Message-ID: <015f01d6937f$8de038a0$a9a0a9e0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHdgZU6ea870NqQMwTBfWlXGQFk2QJACqioAeA0ZgkDDuCk5Kkygpdw
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [73.96.106.215]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/tbXaKdKXF7VfyeV0Tde4MFbY27w>
Subject: Re: [COSE] Proposed charter update
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 21:05:30 -0000


-----Original Message-----
From: COSE <cose-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 11:30 AM
To: Göran Selander <goran.selander=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>; cose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [COSE] Proposed charter update

On 2020-09-25, at 20:18, Göran Selander <goran.selander=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> The only difference between the compressed X.509 format and the native format is in what is being signed.

So “natively signed” might be a term that we can use.

[JLS] This seems to be a much cleaner term.  So maybe we are looking at "CBOR Compressed X.509 certificate" and "natively signed CBOR Compressed X.509 certificate"
Jim


Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
COSE@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email