Re: [Crisp] REMINDER: LAST CALL

On Friday 26 March 2004 1:27 pm, April Marine wrote:
> Just a reminder that we are about halfway through working group last call
> on the following docs:
>
> draft-ietf-crisp-iris-core-05.txt
> draft-ietf-crisp-iris-dreg-05.txt
> draft-ietf-crisp-iris-beep-05.txt
>
> So far discussion has been, well, minimal is too big a word.  That's fine
> if you have no issues.  But I should warn you that we are going to be
> inclined to give "after last call" input as little attention as we
> possibly can without ignoring some show-stopping item should it descend
> upon us.

Given that there has be zero discussion on this last call, I thought that I 
would report that I have actually reviewed iris-core-05 and hope to review 
beep-05 and dreg-05 very shortly.  I did not find any substative issues with 
core-05 (except... see below) but I did find a number of editorial issues 
that I have forwarded to the authors.

The only non-editorial issue that I found in iris-core was about the <limit> 
element.  It occurred to me that the <limit> element is, by its very nature, 
unable to express all of the possible different actual policies that might be 
in effect.  It might be a good idea to 1) allow servers to express in XML 
that there are additional unepxressed limits in place and 2) provide a way 
for server operators to point clients at (arbitrary) text within the <limits> 
element.  This text could be used to either describe the actual limits in 
words, or provide other policy information.

-- 
David Blacka    <davidb@verisignlabs.com> 
Sr. Engineer    Verisign Applied Research

_______________________________________________
Crisp mailing list
Crisp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp