IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review of draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve

Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@gmail.com> Fri, 07 February 2020 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jeanphilippe.aumasson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC2A120120 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 23:59:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ALTOv8NHFaj for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 23:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E11B612003E for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 23:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id p9so1538753wmc.2 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 23:59:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OA1qpD1JvTTE4CQt0ThJkft8BMk8oaaIo0003rzDPtA=; b=ryfx8PoazDl4415whxxofuCSmmT+0p62Q9cI+hLqJx4OO9KK8fQPtkxC1KtLgCVCpa QUCS5GDC/Ma8NYcS4b+FaQmEO5YZ6Rqt7GKxoo2vm/ZyzuhhmnoBgp0yQBNBz0Qp9d/I MFCZTkE7mtdp8lnnydPF1uBc17g8ldxtij8kBu+aaDQBz6SP5zjKYQagvWrr4kOj9JMR o47dUJhhNT0rD90NQBuIxRo93xPb4kYbkB1rTWUDZyHy50TZaN4FrFpWDocLM5exVcS9 gGY2It4rYoRttfFcFtRb6E/BIaCAmucsb9zQ7dvbNgUSy4doMbwyVGZll3Ts5BzBOlQJ ajmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OA1qpD1JvTTE4CQt0ThJkft8BMk8oaaIo0003rzDPtA=; b=fXNV5tkTtq2imRzXhxfScNzZ5MHXv+TxgHPZLWVyrD03ccOHeQgpTTsGu5MOgC4y6y NbNJJ1pzJEyfK4shBs7ChkHtnXQ3jKZcy9sUeWI3lEhDtqJgnZOJJLihOTgJ1LMIxL1b hYLxadt8CI0DMwwcXo+AjFAP2zLaWCACQpbXhNwSWG1g1C+whskO+MY+CutiHzULXSWq gtQVslEeB/fb4OYZkc9HWycw7s+aCqGrfAKL4HFDiK2afElSDz62cax9lns6hKmvlefX 3TCpv3AXCnWNBcsglbSpSrYa5eDcTYo+yjPkv2uAyc1ZZWuuRrv23SdBW1vhs3/eaLB4 SQwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXpVxUOK5EPhkdrHaDxw18IseUHQJc3qpy9vhj101aLQ9ND2Bou Y/O7RGrbzm7DkDdxutY1VvAalEKkWG2FXJ2s88/EVbcu
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8GSPKUdC5GF4ZEGEIRXATELbIYYLm6cvceBKoVTJoV275oF2SWQkWk0Wnel1nKDLTVwqXRMbS44MG7yYdXvg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2c41:: with SMTP id r1mr2739436wmg.57.1581062360366; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 23:59:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMr0u6kkhEUoMZcT_MU2KidGuy83SWZxybi3-Ut5VNLFEDVcww@mail.gmail.com> <CAGiyFdfBEgjtb72-9TJckJxED7WabrUF5aXmFdsy9amP+c4y2w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMr0u6=H_=zdq9s4grypAKg4Zan8S=YEE7kLL4jomd-pvfaMTg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMr0u6=H_=zdq9s4grypAKg4Zan8S=YEE7kLL4jomd-pvfaMTg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 08:59:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGiyFdehYankTQNgkY6hc=2WDQz4NyjcYUHOW5-4MNknuQM+Gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Cc: crypto-panel@irtf.org, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005b8520059df7c4c8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/CF2UPQSGQ0E08QYIREHEqIzECJs>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review of draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:59:24 -0000

Sounds good :)

I'm familiar with CFRG's goal but as it's my first review, wanna make sure
that we agree on the goals: do these include.. ?

1. technical correctness of the document
2. editorial quality
3. value of the content against alternative solutions
4. relevance of the topic wrt CFRG's goals

Thanks!


On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:50 AM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Jean-Philippe,
>
> Many thanks for your reply, your readiness to do a review and for the
> warning!
> Regardimg BLAKE3 – unlike the PAKE selection process, the Crypto Review
> Panel reviews for the draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve draft can be
> considered as independent opinions of the experts, that can help to
> highlight possible problems with the document (and can be disputed later by
> the authors).
>
> In my personal opinion (with my CFRG chair hat off), if you
> mention conflict-of-interest warning in your review, that will be enough.
>
> Regards,
> Stanislav
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 10:27, Jean-Philippe Aumasson <
> jeanphilippe.aumasson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> sure, but conflict-of-interest warning: I'm a co-designer of BLAKE3 (
>> https://blake3.io), a function that can be seen as a competitor of K12
>> in the super-fast, parallel hash category. I can do the review as
>> objectively as I can but could understand that the CoI might be a concern
>> for some (including the draft authors).
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> JP
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 7:50 AM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Jean-Philippe,
>>>
>>> As we discussed yesterday with Alexey and Nick, we would like to ask you
>>> about reviewing the current version of draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve (
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve/).
>>> Could you consider the possibility of providing such a review?
>>>
>>> Of course, we will be happy to receive reviews from all Crypto Review
>>> Panel members.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Stanislav (on behalf of the CFRG chairs)
>>>
>>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email