Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms

"Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> Wed, 14 August 2019 05:50 UTC

Return-Path: <smyshsv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE36120058 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GraOq0wQH-lF for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 308E3120052 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e27so8528022ljb.7 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hBboSvREIZnunZR8tdjKaBlZhtfYwPEsAFSv86IMvGo=; b=vgw+iMk/2zg3sQv93uwhqSnMENuCq38uWlU6LixUExku5mR+fWC/YDJlFYIZXNcVCx kxrlN3fk8mWxw65BUQibo7nqng2BL8+JWMxgINMUMCTLHP4Gtach9vZFhA8Jaw5XWshA 3a9Jlei/H/VMci114MDIbxa6oDdWWpSAJV0QCCDsatQnMC3He62OtOCzcEUmgBqgo+yI 7xDeIdaxCAWRofSdPv4num6cqkaXteYqGgJ8jWvv5hnHPqp1twQXwzI5q4CQumVvcqQy 5nCi1XL7WfU3AtC2+bHYuK7bd7v1Y8ASOXX9o8M7PRo28B9tedZGd6Y443fLlMwbt5I4 u2fQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hBboSvREIZnunZR8tdjKaBlZhtfYwPEsAFSv86IMvGo=; b=TrMh2B+v2XJUFgKLBg9s8spu/nUDUbRRcLUqHAxw5d3cpcQOK+Ar/wS+HPcVdhc9Ys j3cTfCfPSCs/WIcec4ue9b/XiF9N+uuSnJ/O/HdIlZFgtCskwGAYuVxV6NZdChu5+dsU C7bOAUzhhA5jCaTBPlc216sn2lT/rhtV7YYKetPRBNSksebc8b2O6Ij+xzwtjRTwGWe8 TcCJ1PhteRtC2jc5PTW6LFq5AucVU89q+KEHbICo/+IjcJp6PPyizS6JOlcOxkN0X8KF madS2AGc2eMbXltyS+3rmehkzt/YjYpuOPvwPyiVGc6shc37/oW+VRnsph5FjRJUK2Zr dD2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUH21PHYK1FBqSl5jRR4rJQKcnHLukDJY0f6MbAvGz1t1Uti5Yx B9Cjfi4PvBeZk5hd/Q53ttgjOJnrJC/aDqBx5DE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwx2d3BNv0MbD+AgHDd7dGG8S9Hp/D50tBs7I8f/riHNLLrJfWNiVxAkh2XktAPh+uIz6nZFkw5Uyq+uuRbB6o=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:805a:: with SMTP id p26mr6491213ljg.235.1565761818235; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 22:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> <B9DA0C3E-0C00-438C-A3E5-776556B73C1B@vigilsec.com> <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com> <d6a6c61a29b3415dae399c7786c074e1@exb2.ex.uni-paderborn.de> <m08srx4gus.fsf@upb.de>
In-Reply-To: <m08srx4gus.fsf@upb.de>
From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 08:50:44 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMr0u6=rpDSb8EdSWweNguTxLE13tfrHH9Wjjnyzcc7XZsM+jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tibor Jager <tibor.jager@upb.de>
Cc: Scott Fluhrer <sfluhrer@cisco.com>, Pierre-Alain Fouque <pa.fouque@gmail.com>, "crypto-panel@irtf.org" <crypto-panel@irtf.org>, "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" <cfrg-chairs@ietf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa971305900d5477"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/IHQQF-OCk8Eyl7kgHH2gtR4v1Pc>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 05:50:23 -0000

Dear Tibor,

Many thanks for your reply!
Would you be able to do a review if the deadline for this first stage
(verification of security assessments) will be moved from September, 15th,
to October, 15th?

Best regards,
Stanislav

вт, 13 авг. 2019 г. в 11:20, Tibor Jager <tibor.jager@upb.de>:

> Dear Stanislav,
>
> These reviews and the corresponding deadlines come at an unfortunate time
> for me, as I already told Alexey last week.
>
> I am currently in the process of moving to a different university, my
> starting date there is September 1st. I am currently spending 110% of my
> time to make sure that all research funds and staff are transferred in due
> order, such that all students will remain funded, which is much less
> trivial than what I would have expected. I also have to organize lectures
> at my old and new university, make sure that students are taken care of,
> etc., and will soon have to start preparing new lectures.
>
> Of course I will try to help as much as possible with the reviews, but it
> is currently very difficult for me to make any promises and binding
> commitments, given the rather tight reviewing deadlines.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Tibor
>
>
>
> Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Currently, we've got only two crypto review panel members who will
> verify the security proofs - Bjoern Tackmann and myself, each of us will
> review 4 PAKEs.
> >
> > I sincerely hope that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fouque and Tibor Jager
> will join us here and help with reviewing the security proofs.
> > Scott, Pierre-Alain, Tibor, will you be able to do this? If yes, which
> of two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or 4 augmented PAKEs) will you prefer?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Stanislav,
> > CFRG Secretary
> >
> >
> > пн, 12 авг. 2019 г. в 10:29, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com
> <mailto:yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>>:
> > Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not be able to review
> > proofs. I will be happy to review the other material.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >         Yaron
> >
> > On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote:
> >> Alexey:
> >>
> >> I am not the right person to review proofs.  I will review the other
> >> gathered material for the submissions, as needed.
> >>
> >> Russ
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com
> <mailto:alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
> >>> <mailto:alexey.melnikov@isode.com<mailto:alexey.melnikov@isode.com>>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dear Crypto Review Panel members!
> >>>
> >>> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection
> >>> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members.
> >>> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the
> >>> following:
> >>> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs
> >>> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th
> 2019.
> >>> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials
> >>> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are
> >>> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers.
> >>> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate
> >>> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified.
> >>> This is to be done by October 30th 2019.
> >>>
> >>> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented.
> >>> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or
> >>> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to
> >>> do that).
> >>>
> >>> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your
> >>> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4
> >>> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of
> them).
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs)
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Crypto-panel mailing list
> >>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org<mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org> <mailto:
> Crypto-panel@irtf.org<mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org>>
> >>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Crypto-panel mailing list
> >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org<mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org>
> >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Crypto-panel mailing list
> > Crypto-panel@irtf.org<mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org>
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
>
>