[Crypto-panel] Fwd: [CFRG] Can I have a review of draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm-sets?

Dear Crypto Review Panel members,

We would like to ask you to review additional parameter sets for LMS
defined in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm-sets/

We have already obtained support from Russ Housley (thanks a lot, Russ!);
could we ask for one more review?

Regards,
Stanislav, Nick, Alexey

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 at 17:41
Subject: [CFRG] Can I have a review of draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm-sets?
To: cfrg@irtf.org <cfrg@irtf.org>

Hi,

   Quynh Dang and I are trying to reserve IANA code points for the
additional parameter sets within draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm_sets.  The
goal of these parameter sets is to reduce the signature size (by about a
third on average) while maintaining a reasonably conservative security
level (192 bits of security).

  One requirement for this to happen is found in the text of RFC 8554,
which states (in section 8, IANA Considerations):

   Additions to these registries require that a specification be

   documented in an RFC or another permanent and readily available

   reference in sufficient detail that interoperability between

   independent implementations is possible [RFC8126].  IANA MUST verify

   that all applications for additions to these registries have first

   been reviewed by the IRTF Crypto Forum Research Group (CFRG).

   I am formally requesting such a review take place.

   Thank you
_______________________________________________
CFRG mailing list
CFRG@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg