Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms

["Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <[e-mail]>]

Great, many thanks!

вт, 13 авг. 2019 г. в 14:50, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <[e-mail]>:

> I’ll see what I can do.
>
>
>
> I don’t personally have any preference – assigned whichever you want to me…
>
>
>
> *From:* Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 13, 2019 1:45 AM
> *To:* Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <[e-mail]>; Pierre-Alain Fouque <
> [e-mail]>; Tibor Jager <[e-mail]>; Tibor Jager <
> [e-mail]>
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Alexey Melnikov <
> [e-mail]>
> *Subject:* Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE
> algorithms
>
>
>
> Currently, we've got only two crypto review panel members who will verify
> the security proofs - Bjoern Tackmann and myself, each of us will review 4
> PAKEs.
>
>
>
> I sincerely hope that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fouque and Tibor Jager
> will join us here and help with reviewing the security proofs.
>
> *Scott*, *Pierre-Alain*, *Tibor*, will you be able to do this? If yes,
> which of two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or 4 augmented PAKEs) will you
> prefer?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Stanislav,
>
> CFRG Secretary
>
>
>
>
>
> пн, 12 авг. 2019 г. в 10:29, Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]>:
>
> Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not be able to review
> proofs. I will be happy to review the other material.
>
> Thanks,
>         Yaron
>
> On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote:
> > Alexey:
> >
> > I am not the right person to review proofs.  I will review the other
> > gathered material for the submissions, as needed.
> >
> > Russ
> >
> >
> >> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]
> >> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Crypto Review Panel members!
> >>
> >> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection
> >> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members.
> >> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the
> >> following:
> >> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs
> >> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th
> 2019.
> >> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials
> >> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are
> >> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers.
> >> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate
> >> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified.
> >> This is to be done by October 30th 2019.
> >>
> >> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented.
> >> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or
> >> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to
> >> do that).
> >>
> >> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your
> >> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4
> >> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of
> them).
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs)
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Crypto-panel mailing list
> >> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
> >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Crypto-panel mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crypto-panel mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
>
>