Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: "Alternative Elliptic Curve Representations"

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 16 July 2021 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D446E3A38FF for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZ0KXPUkzoEu for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 841D73A3904 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9C8300BF8 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:26:49 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id a7znXOOwKDnc for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:26:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10722300231; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:26:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <CB4A3395-64A4-468C-8396-EC378E43201D@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1F744C68-07B5-40CE-9242-CF5C4EC445E0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:26:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAMr0u6k5YtibUyB-6kmrB0B1zLNyqxr-UrZA6StkrkcwZL_z4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: crypto-panel@irtf.org, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org
To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
References: <CAMr0u6k5YtibUyB-6kmrB0B1zLNyqxr-UrZA6StkrkcwZL_z4Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/VAMfsMpnaDIUpayYSBtHMzU-1rY>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: "Alternative Elliptic Curve Representations"
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:26:55 -0000

I have already done a review of this document in another context, so I suggest someone else take a look.

Russ


> On Jul 16, 2021, at 4:50 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Crypto Panel Experts, 
> 
> We've obtained a request for review of the version -21 of the "Alternative Elliptic Curve Representations" draft, draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-21, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations/>
> 
> The Crypto Panel (that was my review back then) provided a review of the -00 version three years ago:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/1itH0lM9w0bZiADJXQkizr8JTiA/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/1itH0lM9w0bZiADJXQkizr8JTiA/>
> 
> The document has changed significantly since then, so the authors ask for a new review. 
> 
> The chairs would like to ask the Crypto Panel to provide a review (another pair of eyes + reviewing all the changes in the document).
> 
> Any volunteers?
> 
> Regards,
> Stanislav (for CFRG Chairs)
> _______________________________________________
> Crypto-panel mailing list
> Crypto-panel@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel