Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms

"Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> Tue, 13 August 2019 05:44 UTC

Return-Path: <smyshsv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5225B12008B for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4UpRFkuVwlp3 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 060BF12008A for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id s19so13210376lfb.9 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oGVCbShoMK1iMpNUsR2KDoMoYIhhcayx8Af5Sv8HNyM=; b=FsaW5Y5JTSLwhF0/OUSReBtOJKL/mVvZX11jTzCH9fzPhdmqUAV8oMMhRV3jLghGPY AnSJP9hlim3vCnFd91ptIB7DYbDKES2YH+YG95g/GKxHzIBO6yF+73u2BMmHp9HJTRzA vkZF8NJ8jjDP73hOma3jmeUvhWMTZfyhenAMr4kVpK649mjTuJGtanIXUgtnFWGH/8Ca s+/QVFIbeXiM6P7wihid99gEPMw20b1WYmoVHqz3kwqklji76+StEDPdxcpF9zPXcIeG ZUuu9b/3Orl2mLAW0p3zxqAnpYJfcVVhc/+ButvDi5EAC5lsF7RS4/sYTUuEvDn4426g vg8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oGVCbShoMK1iMpNUsR2KDoMoYIhhcayx8Af5Sv8HNyM=; b=NgSMC0bQ2/6qQpJVVUhJBYSrUsE96TDECwMkRXGQOJLSJZG3MT1cNDozcAk+HuCe4+ yz5Vht/E91+GnpdJSYgRjJg+nfCNunoNnsyLKDy5HOSGezTHJ/TRxthbNdq/z78OWNWm GMfXemzOZPto4QYjmurm+lcW4kisI95VZSnKCwkn3taJKztLBDH5BLqmY623w6UoDPp3 qeNZUhE4Gyicn4Wd0nvWuM6BCmjgxR4uYervw6yq0GrZkUFB/6rLTjUfndMhpIVQhNpn Q7fLB4CCi6Z5nwVLYZEAEfTHImYgAyUn50WvDrsnbuk4ZtSgLIMx0UQZbitEHtboJumc 42TA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUzvQD0Dkk9GaBtYPrFRpskiN1KPe9MNua+cjsPn2jIu9x2S1S ERSWbKy7s9dkdqAvbI6X9N5qUm9ocUqlkyNFHCM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwzs+yKHXwajp4a7vsT0EBTH1hESpui6FAbKXyayMbUtDPr0ihlScIVX7myh+2vHyjthCnhCBA/IUBmXnkZNAs=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5c1d:: with SMTP id r29mr19880013lfp.72.1565675089197; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com> <B9DA0C3E-0C00-438C-A3E5-776556B73C1B@vigilsec.com> <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2981832d-1b80-b028-49a0-a605a067cd49@gmail.com>
From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:45:15 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMr0u6n7rCg4d7j_ygQqim2mEdEo7Gav5DEHuNpET1338M_j1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Fluhrer <sfluhrer@cisco.com>, Pierre-Alain Fouque <pa.fouque@gmail.com>, Tibor Jager <tibor.jager@gmail.com>, Tibor Jager <tibor.jager@upb.de>
Cc: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" <crypto-panel@irtf.org>, "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" <cfrg-chairs@ietf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000867e4a058ff92386"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/XnPsOMPGrrSSuxSoqLmG5FnQdmk>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 05:44:53 -0000

Currently, we've got only two crypto review panel members who will verify
the security proofs - Bjoern Tackmann and myself, each of us will review 4
PAKEs.

I sincerely hope that Scott Fluhrer, Pierre-Alain Fouque and Tibor Jager
will join us here and help with reviewing the security proofs.
*Scott*, *Pierre-Alain*, *Tibor*, will you be able to do this? If yes,
which of two batches (4 balanced PAKEs or 4 augmented PAKEs) will you
prefer?

Best regards,
Stanislav,
CFRG Secretary


пн, 12 авг. 2019 г. в 10:29, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>:

> Same as Russ, I am not a cryptographer and will not be able to review
> proofs. I will be happy to review the other material.
>
> Thanks,
>         Yaron
>
> On 07/08/2019 22:46, Russ Housley wrote:
> > Alexey:
> >
> > I am not the right person to review proofs.  I will review the other
> > gathered material for the submissions, as needed.
> >
> > Russ
> >
> >
> >> On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com
> >> <mailto:alexey.melnikov@isode.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Crypto Review Panel members!
> >>
> >> According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection
> >> process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members.
> >> More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the
> >> following:
> >> 1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs
> >> of the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th
> 2019.
> >> 2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials
> >> (including independent reviews). If additional explanations are
> >> needed, Crypto Review Panel members ask for them from the designers.
> >> Crypto Review Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate
> >> PAKEs, based on the materials that have been gathered and verified.
> >> This is to be done by October 30th 2019.
> >>
> >> We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented.
> >> Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or
> >> all 4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to
> >> do that).
> >>
> >> Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your
> >> willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4
> >> balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of
> them).
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs)
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Crypto-panel mailing list
> >> Crypto-panel@irtf.org <mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org>
> >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Crypto-panel mailing list
> > Crypto-panel@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crypto-panel mailing list
> Crypto-panel@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
>