Re: [cso] Directional Changes for CSO work
Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com> Tue, 14 September 2010 16:16 UTC
Return-Path: <ylee@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: cso@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cso@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4CB3A69FA for <cso@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.66
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.476, BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vlR3Q0YCt6nY for <cso@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga02-in.huawei.com (usaga02-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAE63A6A04 for <cso@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L8Q00JIMVUNPO@usaga02-in.huawei.com> for cso@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from L73682 ([10.124.12.96]) by usaga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L8Q00246VUNFV@usaga02-in.huawei.com> for cso@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:15:59 -0500
From: Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA0153CEC9@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se>
To: 'Daniele Ceccarelli' <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, cso@ietf.org
Message-id: <002801cb5428$1e7ee9d0$600c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_EdPROfMpcb0O40g5lE8z7Q)"
Thread-index: ActQXxA88X5W1POYR0euIugga8KXkQDw/PPwAABihdA=
References: <009b01cb505f$109b9ce0$600c7c0a@china.huawei.com> <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA0153CEC9@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se>
Subject: Re: [cso] Directional Changes for CSO work
X-BeenThere: cso@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: This list is for pre-WG technical discussion of cross stratum optimization <cso.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cso>, <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cso>
List-Post: <mailto:cso@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cso>, <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:16:11 -0000
Hi Daniel, Thanks for your comment. The actual work on PCE will be worked on close collaboration between the PCE WG and this WG (assuming this will be a new WG). This WG is focused on the Query that tells Network Stratum (PCE is one of the component in the network stratum), for instance, to estimate latency between point A and B, then PCE might be used to estimate such request, or some other mechanism similar to PCE. I believe this particular mechanism is already in place in PCE. But how PCE communicates with the NCG needs to be collaborated between PCE WG and this work. Another example is how PCE would provide virtual network topology to application stratum is subject to the interest of the PCE WG. In a nutshell, NS Query triggers many works in the network stratum in the area of policy, network management, PCE, etc. I will look at why needed sections of both documents and clarify them. If you can suggest some text on that, that will be also great. Best Regards, Young _____ From: Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:43 AM To: Young Lee; cso@ietf.org Subject: RE: [cso] Directional Changes for CSO work Hi Young, the "why needed" sections of both documents are not very clear in my opinion. Could you please better clafiry what is needed that is not actually covered or that cannot be covered by the PCE wg? >From my undestanding it seems that most of the extensions could be covered by the PCE WG, but maybe i'm wrong. Many thanks and best regards Daniele _____ From: cso-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cso-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Young Lee Sent: giovedì 9 settembre 2010 22.39 To: cso@ietf.org Subject: [cso] Directional Changes for CSO work Hi, After a couple of conference calls with Ron Bonica (OPS AD) and Dan Romanscanu (OPS AD), we narrowed down the scope of work and have broken the CSO work into two pieces: (i) Network Aware Application Mobility (NAAM) (ii) Network Stratum Query (NS Query) Please see the draft charter descriptions in the attachment. Depending on the result of the IESG approval, we might pursue these two pieces as separate work items down the road if both are approved. Please also note that among many potential CSO applicability, we have narrowed the work in the context of Data Centers. The following diagram depicts the contexts of both NAAM and NS Query. If you are still interested in the new scope, wed appreciate your comments on the charter descriptions or any other related matters. Thanks. Best Regards, Young
- Re: [cso] Directional Changes for CSO work Young Lee
- [cso] Directional Changes for CSO work Young Lee
- Re: [cso] Directional Changes for CSO work Greg Bernstein
- Re: [cso] Directional Changes for CSO work Ning So
- Re: [cso] Directional Changes for CSO work Young Lee
- Re: [cso] Directional Changes for CSO work Daniele Ceccarelli
- [cso] Two new drafts Young Lee