IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Curdle] draft-ietf-curdle-rsa-sha2-05

denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 24 April 2017 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D169F13193D for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ix4O6VfXiwpj for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BF701294A6 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id y33so125594355qta.2 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JX7+R10W51xRa1jcR0dAuk8c2rR9ILIutrotW2TX8tE=; b=IEjLzdzkEqncN9qrXt5bovpCAOhZ/snjIVD8LAjDvVH65f1mSmsk2fJGEqLh6o5pCY RWTEtVBjmzVCrpJ8bwXXBNHVspzAaZVCezYysH0zcgtqc8G2v5KDXfJTVI8vPR4dcjtZ Lqo/E8XLIVUB2j0YLCPDD99BUYtvh+80BMw2OGs26NDWXKZo52JuZCHAXrCn7W8jlkNE mnO3SW3hZIDf2GESXrOun1JjlJNo36pHHpYIbirVQtGE1ZrCSBRI6o+uIuOmAJWP4gdY XxmdPuZ00RQzqo64mfOzjDuwLCVXgcFr+ZiOzoFLHPZ6nbdKqA+hHF6QZKthwV+czIrM 3OJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JX7+R10W51xRa1jcR0dAuk8c2rR9ILIutrotW2TX8tE=; b=DO1m6BQzKkYpm9cO8l9aRlXyMip3EE1xywmFgjeud6zRhyTlGMllbPclzu7wkNczKU KWzCRt2PNp0rATh78BC9cGjZ3hlJa6CrrKkx0HV8YWfXGyVFBVrygs2sCKFIO3O43d7w 4qGKDGQdfL+dQoLcYDsU6l/kVO1wOMBeIY7jfB78z5t300/SH/09BZ7zD1tie+lWYv8j PyyefU7GWpxLuWBvL9Rn+Xx4++BfgjVR9Fi0kGmxWufZ69QNN8w5e2+zdjCaW3dERhBq Nyn+4AjMHSOUIDhA4oBOSAbG43ZYPHIyyAiKV0g3pbXZhdos8P9J72LNg0pV4OVdrVU+ UzcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7qpCHWMqaD+5lXzKclqKpO8lDbiYT96jrSfixtGDx4sKDxdQEM MsrwuAh33rW3Rbfzb2BSYpCK1raA2g==
X-Received: by 10.237.52.5 with SMTP id w5mr17864579qtd.22.1493069492718; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.138.239 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2100.1492648147@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
References: <7182.1492447893@eng-mail01.juniper.net> <CADPMZDCKLuXGx8ap7s8kC-R7vefz=9P8ScnbhopC-Mwy-Lm6Mg@mail.gmail.com> <2100.1492648147@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
From: denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:31:32 -0600
Message-ID: <CADPMZDA4CrLBELQ+WpHbzbNJXv_WSpT5MayAVtiXQNdDKFHn3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>
Cc: curdle <curdle@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0b6d8ebd17a5054df0542a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/-FwIqNmoeE7i0O1UsG-m0vC2lQw>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] draft-ietf-curdle-rsa-sha2-05
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:31:35 -0000

Thanks. :-)

I have clarified this in today's updated version, which also addresses some
nits.

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Mark D. Baushke <mdb@juniper.net> wrote:

> denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > RFC 3447 is obsoleted by RFC 8017, which is currently listed as a
> > normative reference. It is normative because it's needed to implement
> > the spec.
>
> Oops. Mea Culpa. You are correct.
>
> > The reference to RFC 8017 is currently made in section 3 (where the
> > signature details are defined). Did you mean another reference should be
> > made to this document in section 5.3? For easier lookup, perhaps?
>
> My issue is that PSS is ambiguous in Section 5.3, 'PSS' is also known as
> RSASSA-PSS (RFC 8017 Section 8.1) which is not to be confused with
> EMSA-PSS (RFC 8017 section 9.1).
>
>         -- Mark
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email