IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Curdle] Agenda / draft status

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com> Tue, 22 November 2016 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <nmav@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2648C1295A7 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 03:08:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3dw-6WAbbKE for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 03:08:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9319E129532 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 03:08:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DA3F3B3C7; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:08:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dhcp-10-40-1-102.brq.redhat.com ([10.40.2.184]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uAMB8Yg4011616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 06:08:36 -0500
Message-ID: <1479812914.31825.25.camel@redhat.com>
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "curdle@ietf.org" <curdle@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:08:34 +0100
In-Reply-To: <1a84efb68dad4227b505a1501966c379@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <1a84efb68dad4227b505a1501966c379@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:08:37 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/BEZF8137t9FOJ2YxzXMV-b1vn3s>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] Agenda / draft status
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:08:39 -0000

On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 12:08 +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> We’ll go over the documents, hopefully move some along.  If you have
> any feedback, or in particular a *blocking item* to bring up, please
> reply here.
 
> draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-00 – ready for WGLC?
>                 Use of EdDSA Signatures in the Cryptographic 
> Message  
> draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-02
>                 EdDSA for DNSSEC
> draft-ietf-curdle-pkix-02 – ready for WGLC?
>                 Algorithm Identifiers for Ed25519, Ed25519ph, Ed448,
> Ed448ph, X25519 and X448 for use in the Internet X.509 Public Key
> Infrastructure

Are there any implementations of the above drafts?

regards,
Nikos

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email