[Curdle] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-dh-group-exchange-05: (with COMMENT)

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-dh-group-exchange-05: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-dh-group-exchange/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I do agree with Spencer, the text that is non-normative reads as if this is
fully deprecating any recommendation below 2048, but then the normative text
just says SHOULD.  Is there a reason this is not MUST?  I know deprecating
things takes a long time.