[Curdle] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8410 (9045)
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 29 July 2026 13:50 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietf.org
Delivered-To: curdle@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from errata-celery-848864fbc6-zwfqr (gaia.k8s.ietf.org [4.156.85.76]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32101208060A; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 06:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1785333016; bh=R+0DMI4FutYTNLVM0NVS4r2pEAQgY8XTQDQ5llU9Iis=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date; b=BtYUuslYExMJkokxYTIBOKWcQTa37+2hlAHp+Brdx4SqqIEXvd+hd6a6YKWOcF0+H grsMTYQKqqNCYD5EbxhlVUkUzXEPBhblwqOIOHb5wONd+4D2omW37Dc1SbuYeoEE+I Xvq9vUUbXsfDABEAEGEjAP7atsojIi8oLAz4hVLs=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
To: ekr@rtfm.com, simon@josefsson.org, daniel.migault@ericsson.com, stndrds-inacio@andrew.cmu.edu, debcooley1@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:50:15 -0000
message-id: <178533301589.19.6960320365587474931@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID-Hash: KGHUGDKAF4ZN2XKHVPFGCCIOG3OVVPBG
X-Message-ID-Hash: KGHUGDKAF4ZN2XKHVPFGCCIOG3OVVPBG
X-MailFrom: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-curdle.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: info@kajkowalski.nl, curdle@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Curdle] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8410 (9045)
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/PS4DaDdV8I7_8fxzWzgUn4vSGVA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:curdle-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:curdle-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:curdle-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8410, "Algorithm Identifiers for Ed25519, Ed448, X25519, and X448 for Use in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure" -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://errata.rfc-editor.org/eid9045/ -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Kaj Kowalski <info@kajkowalski.nl> Section 9 says: Original Text ------------- pk-X25519 PUBLIC-KEY ::= { IDENTIFIER id-X25519 -- KEY no ASN.1 wrapping -- PARAMS ARE absent CERT-KEY-USAGE { keyAgreement } PRIVATE-KEY CurvePrivateKey } KeyWrapAlgorithms KEY-WRAP ::= { kwa-aes128-wrap | kwa-aes256-wrap, ... } kaa-X448 KEY-AGREE ::= { IDENTIFIER id-X448 PARAMS ARE absent PUBLIC-KEYS {pk-X448} UKM -- TYPE no ASN.1 wrapping -- ARE preferredPresent SMIME-CAPS { TYPE AlgorithmIdentifier{KEY-WRAP, {KeyWrapAlgorithms}} IDENTIFIED BY id-X448 } } pk-X448 PUBLIC-KEY ::= { IDENTIFIER id-X448 -- KEY no ASN.1 wrapping -- PARAMS ARE absent CERT-KEY-USAGE { keyAgreement } PRIVATE-KEY CurvePrivateKey } Corrected Text -------------- pk-X25519 PUBLIC-KEY ::= { IDENTIFIER id-X25519 -- KEY no ASN.1 wrapping -- PARAMS ARE absent CERT-KEY-USAGE { keyAgreement, encipherOnly, decipherOnly } PRIVATE-KEY CurvePrivateKey } KeyWrapAlgorithms KEY-WRAP ::= { kwa-aes128-wrap | kwa-aes256-wrap, ... } kaa-X448 KEY-AGREE ::= { IDENTIFIER id-X448 PARAMS ARE absent PUBLIC-KEYS {pk-X448} UKM -- TYPE no ASN.1 wrapping -- ARE preferredPresent SMIME-CAPS { TYPE AlgorithmIdentifier{KEY-WRAP, {KeyWrapAlgorithms}} IDENTIFIED BY id-X448 } } pk-X448 PUBLIC-KEY ::= { IDENTIFIER id-X448 -- KEY no ASN.1 wrapping -- PARAMS ARE absent CERT-KEY-USAGE { keyAgreement, encipherOnly, decipherOnly } PRIVATE-KEY CurvePrivateKey } Notes ----- This erratum remains applicable after RFC 9295. RFC 9295 Section 3 replaces RFC 8410 Section 5 and normatively requires keyAgreement while permitting either encipherOnly or decipherOnly to also be present for certificates whose SubjectPublicKeyInfo identifies X25519 or X448. RFC 9295 does not update the ASN.1 module in RFC 8410 Section 9, where both pk-X25519 and pk-X448 continue to omit these two permitted bits. RFC 5912 defines PUBLIC-KEY.&keyUsage as the set of bits legal for the key type and explicitly states that this set does not express how bits may be paired. Adding encipherOnly and decipherOnly to CERT-KEY-USAGE therefore does not permit both bits to be asserted together; RFC 9295 Section 3 continues to govern valid combinations. The correction is also consistent with RFC 5280 Section 4.2.1.3, which defines encipherOnly and decipherOnly only in conjunction with keyAgreement, and with the Diffie-Hellman, KEA, and elliptic-curve key agreement PUBLIC-KEY definitions in RFC 5912, which list keyAgreement, encipherOnly, and decipherOnly as legal key-usage bits. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8410 (draft-ietf-curdle-pkix) -------------------------------------- Title : Algorithm Identifiers for Ed25519, Ed448, X25519, and X448 for Use in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Publication Date : August 2018 Author(s) : S. Josefsson, J. Schaad Category : Proposed Standard Source : curdle (sec) Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG