Re: [Curdle] AD review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-chacha20-poly1305-03

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE5A129841 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:20:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XWk8aoFOqtzn for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:20:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ACAB129801 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AB930024B for <curdle@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:09:51 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 5IPHFIvZcUC6 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:09:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DECB3001FC; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:09:50 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A1EDB0AF-1BAD-4960-934C-616839D7C5AB"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <f04798d8-6d68-e909-7a82-b29320eb79e7@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 13:15:19 -0500
Message-Id: <AD71ADD0-B5C8-4D50-8655-3354C8250954@vigilsec.com>
References: <b27e8b77-5025-23f0-e71f-9c10af0b2265@cs.tcd.ie> <6E89FD59-D2DA-4697-AF37-5041B09F2035@vigilsec.com> <f04798d8-6d68-e909-7a82-b29320eb79e7@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/R3UF5dFH8lB7m9d6TJz85waAI-c>
Cc: "curdle@ietf.org" <curdle@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] AD review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-chacha20-poly1305-03
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 18:20:11 -0000

> My AD review of this draft is below. I think a revised I-D is
> needed before IETF LC for at least section 4, but please argue with
> me if I'm wrong about that.

I just posted -04.  I believe that it addresses all of your comments.

Russ