Re: [Curdle] Adoption of rc4-die-die-die document

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 18 August 2017 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0CC13234C for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5d6h1ea1B8zd for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22b.google.com (mail-yw0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87E7813228D for <curdle@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id n83so38264810ywn.2 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mENMc6EpGSVoocfJicVK3wKuC5yDPCohk7e0pOWe1tE=; b=Z0jdKh8gbi5EOGyMj2u0XSfcNVoZHKKa/vSauDaELT7N+fqBOM7FuBAh+WmPJe4fp3 T9eYTyEFnx2JFRal7cQ/Zr/mizEqzweR03k5tRVg1B2QKXofcg7PAAdrhAJvr1OKBqgO r2EP/p4X/U3F4H9wIrXimdlzZakBEqTaV0xDkZn2oTNbwXCe7DTazx3uJRBR6GKCpClX 0vK+NJ4t035br8mQLNK3ghwuXlAqJyZ8PNFdvFgjJA/XJXdV4EIC8xKaRgj3Fg22lwcX dWTsNlmHIxgxvS0jp0xme3h3T14gfJMtr42rQrcpESXw1OJw2StCaUqNSsjULH+CsBgh YYlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mENMc6EpGSVoocfJicVK3wKuC5yDPCohk7e0pOWe1tE=; b=P4spTUmou2yM+JlJgUPTxqw5h1o8BqA33n5B5gIh/8KoUJxyIPVdQnAKAjYLJ5bQ3v x/6KU4ZtOSplW0yltYpMI/9wphAozzU3wU7hfxsjt/ep3WOWJHgawqzpK+FGJ+j/26Vi lsASM0hgdjfx8GHRGNb9+JWzoul+IRt/Ouv90TH+liLwBhy18jKB6BtQeHEeNsb9pc+8 7Q6lrSA5P+wM7nSR1RX7Wn+nge0LGSQAu47tHpZqKNmZ6CRaMnKU9VEy+X6nQ21R7tjx htVQIhhZ3g1wUlU7xtUBLn3s/OHzyCiRjTpmC7w6C87yEo63uzt66/FCiD07TRr+BAK3 eeow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5gvYOHIibTchcM0uV0N8jrWJHJPhy2pgqllfRee89lYr2bMgKVK V6pNSF7/Z8oI+ySmwXE+UOFQkNk6ACyy
X-Received: by 10.37.45.74 with SMTP id s10mr8381183ybe.204.1503091784884; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.218.130 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOTVcqrYc9657ofc3+ymoR+VdzZutG0-kX8QEOsTokacw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AF662C78-D0D9-4C57-8B45-B95C2311A048@akamai.com> <98476.1502913419@eng-mail01.juniper.net> <2F006ADF-DEA8-4E9B-8066-BD4F023857AC@akamai.com> <CABcZeBOTVcqrYc9657ofc3+ymoR+VdzZutG0-kX8QEOsTokacw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:29:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMn==phuC4WH+kS9VvxpT4CP5NM0i597z8t0Qzck2wRfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>, "curdle@ietf.org" <curdle@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4030435c9f0e73afe05570dd3ba"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/lSCMefWtHlVC-BMWqPLF_OEJjxQ>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] Adoption of rc4-die-die-die document
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 21:29:48 -0000

Hi Rich,

Given the cross-area nature of this work, we think it would be best if you
presented it at the SECDISPATCH meeting in Singapore (see my post
a few minutes ago at SAAG for context). Then we can use that process
to figure out the best approach.

Best,
-Ekr


On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> Kathleen and I are discussing how best to proceed and will get back to you
> shortly.
>
> Best,
> -Ekr
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
>
>> ➢ That said, I believe RC4 should be condemned for all of the IETF. So,
>> ➢ who do we need to ask for the ability to speak for all of the IETF about
>> ➢ the insecurity of RC4?
>>
>> It would start with our AD, Eric.  Ping Eric ☺
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Curdle mailing list
>> Curdle@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle
>>
>
>