[Curdle] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 28 August 2019 11:02 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietf.org
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33576120108; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 04:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves@ietf.org, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>, curdle-chairs@ietf.org, daniel.migault@ericsson.com, curdle@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <156699015116.32300.11396032996637636651.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 04:02:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/o87lp-QbIzN2U-A1xhofVDs3ev4>
Subject: [Curdle] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:02:31 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves-10: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Question to the IESG/responsible AD: I found this: "Appendix A. Copying conditions Regarding this entire document or any portion of it, the authors make no guarantees and are not responsible for any damage resulting from its use. The authors grant irrevocable permission to anyone to use, modify, and distribute it in any way that does not diminish the rights of anyone else to use, modify, and distribute it, provided that redistributed derivative works do not contain misleading author or version information. Derivative works need not be licensed under similar terms." Does it make sense to have this in addition to the usual IETF terms? And/or why is this needed here? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- One minor comment: In section 3, would it make sense to actually name what the "appropriate SSH "protocol error"" is?
- [Curdle] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
- Re: [Curdle] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-i… Mark D. Baushke
- Re: [Curdle] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-i… Aris Adamantiadis
- Re: [Curdle] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-i… Ron Frederick
- Re: [Curdle] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-i… denis bider