Re: [Curdle] draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2 and diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 (1024-bit DH)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 11:39 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B43812420B for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7hvP_CUsjKvV for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43065131B33 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E6530056B for <curdle@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:39:38 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id fQ0Tkbjzngov for <curdle@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dhcp-88c4.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-88c4.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.136.196]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86A7E300288; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:39:35 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <22892.35863.542104.942153@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:39:32 -0400
Cc: curdle@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A9F5E1BB-967B-4DA7-8E3D-7AE8CC06EA47@vigilsec.com>
References: <22892.35863.542104.942153@fireball.acr.fi>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/shtsS3oqhrWciX1gBm7eZiPSdoM>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2 and diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 (1024-bit DH)
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:39:40 -0000

I agree with Tero.  However, I like the use of SHOULD+ and MUST- to signal to project and product planners what is coming.  

Russ


> On Jul 17, 2017, at 6:06 AM, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> wrote:
> 
> I think it is bad idea to go from MUST to implement algorithm to MUST
> NOT implement in one step. Especially as this will make all current
> ssh implementations non-conforming as they do still implement
> diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 even when it might be disabled by default.
> 
> We are defining here a MUST implement and MUST not implement, not MUST
> use and MUST NOT use recommendations.
> 
> In IPsec we moved from MUST to SHOULD NOT just because that reason,
> i.e., we didn't want to make all implementations non-conforming, and
> forbid backwards compatibility with old implementations which might
> only support previous MUST implement algorithm.
> 
> Also I guess there is quite a lot of ssh implementations in routers
> and other devices which might not get updates very quickly, and they
> might only support diffie-hellman-group1-sha1, and with this change,
> new implementations cannot talk to them, as new implementations MUST
> NOT implement diffie-hellman-group1-sha1.
> 
> I would suggest changing it to SHOULD NOT and say that in future it
> might be changed to MUST NOT.
> -- 
> kivinen@iki.fi