Re: [Curdle] Second AD Review: draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves.

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 15 August 2019 03:58 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E0E120018 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 20:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GX4wCnQufx0N for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 20:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFAD612002E for <curdle@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 20:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x7F3woeT025060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 23:58:52 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 22:58:49 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Ron Frederick <ronf=40timeheart.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, curdle <curdle@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190815035849.GK88236@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <CABcZeBM1xaLR2RqYo8_VmO1ue2qr3rn_52MhSDHagKhNF-AYQA@mail.gmail.com> <20190730214702.GS47715@kduck.mit.edu> <31257.1564525402@contrail-ubm16-mdb.svec1.juniper.net> <20190730231321.GU47715@kduck.mit.edu> <CADZyTk=9-pJ8mkwKSDMcZtN2DfD=C2OBDSm6v2pcvp-J2hekqg@mail.gmail.com> <0D4BB5A9-5E34-4038-BD5B-1EE63A67447D@juniper.net> <7859169F-D86B-4027-B060-6BAA6FD6CA6A@timeheart.net> <20190812222754.GE88236@kduck.mit.edu> <784.1565672723@contrail-ubm16-mdb.svec1.juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <784.1565672723@contrail-ubm16-mdb.svec1.juniper.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/tfjuC2yDdn8u85R2xxb-07ajpFw>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] Second AD Review: draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves.
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 03:58:57 -0000

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:05:23PM -0700, Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> Hi Ron & Ben,
> 
> Modulo the date stamp changes and the line break changes, here is what
> the modified text looks like after trying to address the comments you
> both made.
> 
> Let me know if I captured your intended changes correctly or not.

Yes, that works for me.

> I can either upload a new version, or just roll these changes into the
> next version after addressing any other comments during LC.

Either way is fine; personally, I would wait until more comments come in.

Thanks!

-Ben