[cuss] IESG Feedback on draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-reqs-07
Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> Tue, 08 November 2011 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2503221F8B73 for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:44:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46LLX7Ngqn8I for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-dy0-f44.google.com (mail-dy0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D41621F8B70 for <cuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dyl37 with SMTP id 37so32333dyl.31 for <cuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:44:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZQliA/LJkfBiPlJytK9vdk/rtcXfctRRrNfu/EeHxqg=; b=NdTIA5CQrOhJkgtUn5XmhuKsNpLir4boZ9S3R5R8JY4Lagr67klD5japqGShHxvGIQ /7thwgSoBBzi1VmZW1jxmt4quZsX7BN4x39OQWb4HRGmP420qT80doGQqEKN4iRQms7f f2DICM2vvXUEYTYwV3By44ufAxry8vjJ7fW9U=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.124.9 with SMTP id me9mr10347050obb.1.1320770670573; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:44:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.117.98 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:44:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:44:30 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKhHsXHppaFaaNWz999X1-=TzYkQXmxkgEMBc0p1ywx9=XaaAg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
To: cuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [cuss] IESG Feedback on draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-reqs-07
X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" <cuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss>
List-Post: <mailto:cuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:44:33 -0000
All,
The IESG has looked at our requirements draft and there are currently
2 DISCUSS and 2 COMMENTs:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-reqs/ballot/
The good news is that they are all easy to resolve.
Robert had a DISCUSS on clarifying the handling of redirections, much
as we have discussed this on the list for the mechanism draft. I'll
include some of the text we discussed there. He also wanted a
clarification about whether there is a requirement that a UA be able
to tell if UUI data has been removed from a request - I'll clarify
that we do not have such a requirement.
Russ had a DISCUSS saying he wanted two of my responses to Ben's
review added to the draft. They related to identity, authorization,
and hop-by-hop security. I'll include them in the next version.
If anyone has any comments or questions on these changes, please send
them to the list before next week - as soon as I-Ds can be submitted,
I'll resubmit with these changes.
- Alan -
- [cuss] IESG Feedback on draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-r… Alan Johnston
- Re: [cuss] IESG Feedback on draft-ietf-cuss-sip-u… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [cuss] IESG Feedback on draft-ietf-cuss-sip-u… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)