[cuss] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-isdn-08

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Tue, 11 March 2014 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF5B1A0763 for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YwckSPdmWA-o for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0C01A074C for <cuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s2BFJTBq006478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:19:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id s2BFJSKi015299 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:19:29 -0500
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.237.229]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id s2BFJQMS019995; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:19:28 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <531F29D0.4050508@bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:20:48 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-isdn@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-isdn@tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cuss/jLo2IHrm59ovS9bjmE1o9x-s3dM
Cc: cuss@ietf.org
Subject: [cuss] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-isdn-08
X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" <cuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:cuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:19:39 -0000

Keith, Alan: In preparation of sending the ISDN draft to IESG, I have
reviewed it.  A few nits are below; I believe these can be attended
during AUTH-48.

I will be finishing up the shepherd's writeup shortly and we will do a
publication request with -08 version.

Here are the three nits that will need to be attended to during AUTH-48:

- Abstract, third line: Replace " "Problem Statement and Requirements
  for Transporting User to User Call Control Information in SIP"
  document" with RFC6567.

- Abstract: s/move to SIP/move to SIP,/

- S7, last paragraph: s/is service 1/is UUS1/
  Reason is that you have used UUS1 instead of service 1 in other places.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq