Re: [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)

[Ludwig Seitz <[e-mail]>]

On 2020-02-26 00:58, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> Ludwig, Hannes,
>
> Can you confirm that you can make the CBOR Web Token Claim change
> requested below?
>
> We also have Chuck Mortimore listed as an expert for this registry,
> but our message to his Salesforce address bounced.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Amanda Baber Lead IANA Services Specialist
>

I strongly disagree with the assessment that the scope claim should be
pushed into the two-byte range.

The reason we introduced the scope claim is that an ACE RS typically
does not have a direct connection to the AS, and is therefore unable to
retrieve the scope of an access token from other sources than the access
token itself.  I therefore assert that ACE access tokens would often
need to contain this claim in order to inform the RS.
Since one of the major drivers of the ACE work has been to reduce the
authorization overhead (otherwise we could just have used vanilla OAuth
2.0), I find it strange to needlessly add to the overhead by making the
encoding of a frequently used claim longer than necessary.

I am willing to listen to the arguments that have lead the expert
reviewer to denying a value in the one-byte range, and discuss the
reasoning further on list.

Regards,

Ludwig


> On Tue Feb 18 22:42:22 2020, [e-mail] wrote:
>> I'm mostly OK with these registrations, however, DO NOT assign the
>> value 9 to "scope".   Rather, please put it in the two-byte range
>> - for instance, with the value 41.
>>
>> -- Mike
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Cwt-reg-review
>> <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Sabrina Tanamal via
>> RT Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 1:06 PM Cc:
>> [e-mail] Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA
>> #1158953] Requested review for IANA registration in
>> draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Resending this request for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sabrina Tanamal Senior IANA Services Specialist
>>
>>> On Sat Dec 21 11:37:11 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>> Hello CWT registry reviewers,
>>>>
>>>> the IESG-designated experts for the CWT claims registry have
>>>> asked me to send a review request to you about the claims
>>>> registered here:
>>>>
>>>> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fto
>>>>
>>>>
ols.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29%23section-
>>>> 8.13&a
>>>> mp;data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7Ce23f64ac1ad74269c3
>>>>
>>>>
c408d7b4b65d45%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C63717656
>>>> 7656665548&amp;sdata=r01W5Bx0gJh9ZPH8eNS%2BY765CnGq11DkknsHYQ751Dk%3
>>>>
>>>>
D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>
>>>> Thank you in advance for you review comments.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ludwig
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Cwt-reg-review
>> mailing list [e-mail]
>> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcwt-
>>
>>
reg-
>> review&amp;data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7Ce23f64ac1ad74269c3c408d7b4b65d45%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637176567656675543&amp;sdata=XxBhQmqxGkCRiBxh0PdhX2IJD8TnbwWl%2Feo8VUsHOsg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>