IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dance] WGLC path forward draft-ietf-dance-client-auth and draft-ietf-dance-tls-clientid

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Tue, 09 January 2024 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dance@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dance@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5FBC151527 for <dance@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 07:07:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MfK54aq0OTOc for <dance@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 07:07:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A728C14F70F for <dance@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 07:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE39C207FA; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 07:06:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net CE39C207FA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1704812807; bh=pIvWcwklhHluhIBvmNckWMjlV+s6ZwSqCQ5a+BBk8gw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OEBGtyqxiKb7aW1NiXJdes1Ksl69K7SmoDK8D3w25NsNrVH/G6ziI1RDgSyFKDgN2 eduX/I11kZwqVXxXgEnDQl5RxLQzYe5RoHRRjdQ9XKWCVUVMScqm7QlbGedbY7jhhd bTkKn+x5KwQEbrkwOnG6sFfX1Ys97123WZwd32is=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Cc: dance@ietf.org, Joey Salazar <joeygsal@gmail.com>, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdXDD2SahTOGbKUogtDjk6se6nU0iGF68c4SVg5KDpH+MA@mail.gmail.com> (Shumon Huque's message of "Mon, 8 Jan 2024 21:11:30 -0500")
References: <CAEhLrag15y1a7TDiFhfh=TT2mgjMWEUw7x-spnJkmcNHMmPJAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdXDD2SahTOGbKUogtDjk6se6nU0iGF68c4SVg5KDpH+MA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 07:06:47 -0800
Message-ID: <ybla5pe4kc8.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dance/g84_moomiwUrOHT5LSWdi6sH2zA>
Subject: Re: [Dance] WGLC path forward draft-ietf-dance-client-auth and draft-ietf-dance-tls-clientid
X-BeenThere: dance@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DANE Authentication for Network Clients Everywhere <dance.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dance>, <mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dance/>
List-Post: <mailto:dance@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dance>, <mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 15:07:23 -0000

Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> writes:

> I've pushed out new versions of dance-client-auth and dance-tls-clientid
> drafts addressing the WGLC comments.

Excellent Shumon, and thank you!

Just to be clear: do you believe that these drafts have sufficiently
resolved all open issues with respect to the LC comments and we move the
documents toward the next step in the publication process?
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email