Re: [dane] Google Chromium team closes DNSSEC/DANE as a WontFix

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Fri, 03 October 2014 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521371A6FB3 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2IGpKGCP2a7p for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a108.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E511A1A15 for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a108.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a108.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF7720058D82 for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=C6nsYqhgBK6/JuHJtE6Y2aGSeFc =; b=yvwIDpQOROYHSQrVOexe/bTaMftVSGcc6YnNAcp7WCTGkrj8rnuTkpZU/BL DyTqV3zHYdcbjhB+gEnmqzjKUWrTXzMN9PdSO+Qrh6QlGG8oz/0sCcICYb2HJBgu pCohKN9JI3vxXzNGdL8Zui6/xPFTv9r7Be4ld1gKB1yTnuUM=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a108.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5414920058D81 for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:27:51 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: dane@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20141003192750.GE4981@localhost>
References: <65B99B57-FDCB-4E0A-A65A-21F80B67C205@isoc.org> <20141003155421.GZ13254@mournblade.imrryr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141003155421.GZ13254@mournblade.imrryr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/2aMRneufJfhJtJbIARaPBaesqo8
Subject: Re: [dane] Google Chromium team closes DNSSEC/DANE as a WontFix
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:27:53 -0000

On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:54:21PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:09:05PM +0000, Dan York wrote:
> > It seems we may not be seeing DANE / DNSSEC support in Google
> > Chrome anytime soon. This ticket was just closed as a WontFix:
> > 
> > Any thoughts?
> 
> I'm not surprised with respect to HTTPS.

But I am surprised at the contents.

> I'd however like to eventually see DANE support in the new
> opportunistic security HTTP.  Perhaps a dialogue can be opened up

Yes, H2 creates a great new opportunity.

> with the browser developer community to understand the pros and
> cons and what it would take to make opportunistic DANE TLS with
> HTTP2 a realistic option. (Is it all about the DNSSEC last mile?
> Something else?)

+1

Nico
--