IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dane] IPSECA

"Osterweil, Eric" <eosterweil@verisign.com> Tue, 24 March 2015 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <eosterweil@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C45D1A8F3B for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LsQfn0Yld4EC for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f97.google.com (mail-oi0-f97.google.com [209.85.218.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8B391ACCEB for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiav63 with SMTP id v63so231814oia.1 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:accept-language:content-language:content-type :mime-version; bh=WvLmlCEz442C8HctT98EcaJ4Q6zS0kzoFpXd4U+w2zo=; b=PwqggkqqbpqMUR4b1cZprbHHSUxkkuDtBp2l0c/tc6mlPv61IWG/g7ySMBmNzPLVsk /GhHqdrin2NdgHzOYnSRapXnwFshLLFlhqH52eEgbHY78+GyywOP040smyEWsAQZd2Ms FXZxcbbBB7nvyFefec5dFBkJh3Z3rU+4KDBaYYll/8fWShfx8L/ek0wC/t31/3F6t8v3 GN+GHngqY/YTq3bcJ7Zcy/frgzlmzjGi1L/pDxfCRiWteltOHJElJl9OmZrVbWnaFbEO DYB1FglJ0/wc26pgVbr7sGVAs31Hr1paid+TTwRJIALCicyJHmle/CPxSFBfhI6asgY4 ZNSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQklRr6d6lvrZbeVqcBV+glJxf+bRxR/Po8a8tWzdCZLwfhGonk6EP47/xHzODjp39RpfBiYT5ocg2C8Ef6q4CsA6k9iUQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.81.74 with SMTP id e68mr8230971qgd.41.1427237415225; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com. [72.13.63.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cd6sm156979qcb.2.2015.03.24.15.50.14 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02 [10.173.152.206]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t2OMoB5h018091 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:50:12 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:50:11 -0400
From: "Osterweil, Eric" <eosterweil@verisign.com>
To: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPSECA
Thread-Index: AQHQZoTinYEJkFr5c0a1jug9i2S9ww==
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:50:11 +0000
Message-ID: <9735F7C2-D87A-4A33-9302-49C54A644EDA@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5E460BA1-08DE-418C-94D5-EDA6E964C97D"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/74lYaDJHGSbvZu5v8bSNCw4Iuz8>
Subject: [dane] IPSECA
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:50:19 -0000

Hey Chairs & WG folk,

Given the discussion on milestones re: IPSEC DANE work at the beginning of the DANE session today we’d like to request working group adoption of the existing IPSECA document:
	https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-osterweil-dane-ipsec-02

We’ve been working on a couple of different flavors of implementation.  We’re hoping to push those out soon too and it’s already benefited from a great deal of discussion here, and we believe it’s definitely ready to become a WG product.

Can the chairs please progress as appropriate?

Thanks,

Eric

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email