IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-14

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 08 February 2017 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA05129437 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:40:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cs6Rh0gJBf2W for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 423EE12941A for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05111BE50; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 20:40:04 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKWmYKioLFIc; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 20:40:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.75] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02109BE3E; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 20:40:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1486586402; bh=kl+n1Kq//BkaVxalzbY5hv0BOzzEGKrkSgHdNZAc0d4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=JKDEUhbra7h0ZArQINCYA705adL40cYnzyXfH/2yCw7A5geEaA+bQ1L61FIdt1Cqt gFxJOVYOQfUqFjybtLj4Z1B5XdUCrLQsIkM/duUFlxMeH+s9/605PCQYyGaqWs0YrB 8DbdyPA8g2qqzdUS7fZ2alDN7WR24wtnFA12LI4Y=
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
References: <20170208150320.14692.qmail@ary.lan> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1702081015340.1371@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <c6dc5069-da43-2e70-d5e6-d0e200fb8523@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 20:40:01 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1702081015340.1371@bofh.nohats.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms040507060104050006050304"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/Aj6eeblXWq5yVF9YKh69LtDj7eA>
Subject: Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-14
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 20:40:08 -0000

Hiya,

On 08/02/17 15:25, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Still not impressed.

While I may well agree, that doesn't answer my question,
which doesn't relate to the application itself but to
the IPR declaration's statement that licensing information
will be provided "later."

Cheers,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email