[dane] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-18: (with COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-18: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this. I only have a few trivial comments:

 2.1.3, first paragraph:

The seems redundant to similar normative language in 2.1.1

2.1.3, last paragraph: "...it may need to issue a
   separate query..."

I assume that means it also may _not_ need to do so. Is it worth
elaborating on that case?

Editorial:

2.3.3, first sentence: This is pretty convoluted. You might consider
breaking it into a few simpler sentences.