IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Working group Last call: draft-ietf-dane-smime-11.txt

"Rose, Scott" <scott.rose@nist.gov> Mon, 25 July 2016 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.rose@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A3312D0C4 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 05:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R6X_1uPp2a8h for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 05:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wsget1.nist.gov (wsget1.nist.gov [IPv6:2610:20:6005:13::150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9892812B043 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 05:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WSXGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov (129.6.18.96) by wsget1.nist.gov (129.6.13.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:11:44 -0400
Received: from postmark.nist.gov (129.6.16.94) by WSXGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov (129.6.18.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.465.0; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:08:43 -0400
Received: from [129.6.140.7] (7-140.antd.nist.gov [129.6.140.7]) by postmark.nist.gov (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id u6PC8fNk013838 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:08:41 -0400
From: "Rose, Scott" <scott.rose@nist.gov>
To: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:08:48 -0400
Message-ID: <39B765CF-462F-4058-A414-F6D931D848B2@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+2wGPgKk9oKJLH+ZF-5pztPMeDv+4=SXP5qgM1-PH7fw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <F7B890A0-6A67-41C0-B46A-831EC55452D3@ogud.com> <CAHw9_i+2wGPgKk9oKJLH+ZF-5pztPMeDv+4=SXP5qgM1-PH7fw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
X-NIST-MailScanner-Information:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/Fp2PFqVjR5Aqg7UudG1cDd_AKe4>
Subject: Re: [dane] Working group Last call: draft-ietf-dane-smime-11.txt
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:08:47 -0000

I have read the document and while not perfect (what is in life?), I 
support its publication.

Scott


On 24 Jul 2016, at 17:06, Warren Kumari wrote:

> Dear Everyone,
>
> A reminder that this WGLC closes tomorrow -- so far we have not really
> seen sufficient feedback on this document. PLEASE review this document
> and provide comment.
>
> I also wanted to make sure people (including the authors) had seen:
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg08382.html
>
> W
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Colleagues
>>
>> The editors of 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smime/ have
>> requested a WGLC,
>> the chairs are satisfied that the document is in good shape. This 
>> message
>> starts a three week WG LC,
>> that concludes on Monday July 25 23:59 UTC (we have extended the
>> usual 2 weeks because of the upcoming meeting, travel, etc).
>>
>> This document is on the Experimental track, it is a close relative of 
>> a
>> prior document from our group
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey/  which 
>> is in
>> AUTH-48 at this point.
>> Any discussions on “local part” other than to point out a 
>> difference between
>> the OPENPGP document and this one are
>> out of scope.
>>
>> Any other issues should be brought forward
>>
>> thanks
>>   Olafur & Warren
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dane mailing list
>> dane@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf
>
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> dane@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane


==================================
Scott Rose, NIST
scottr@nist.gov
ph: +1-301-975-8439
Google Voice: +1-571-249-3671

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email