Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways
Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> Tue, 06 October 2015 20:56 UTC
Return-Path: <jgh@wizmail.org>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF47F1B333A for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w7Dktj2RqO-r for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizmail.org (wizmail.org [IPv6:2a00:1940:107::2:0:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5677C1B3339 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2a00:b900:109e:0:3e97:eff:feb2:e128] (helo=lap.dom.ain) by wizmail.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_89-e1eedf0) id 1ZjZHe-0007tE-Jb for dane@ietf.org (return-path <jgh@wizmail.org>); Tue, 06 Oct 2015 20:56:26 +0000
To: dane@ietf.org
References: <20150921035448.5523.qmail@ary.lan> <56141976.5010704@seantek.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1510061538510.80750@ary.lan>
From: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
Message-ID: <56143573.9030206@wizmail.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 21:56:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1510061538510.80750@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pcms-Received-Sender: [2a00:b900:109e:0:3e97:eff:feb2:e128] (helo=lap.dom.ain) with esmtpsa
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/J-BcPSqXMbhQGUnMW9HJjK3D2qQ>
Subject: Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 20:56:30 -0000
On 06/10/15 20:44, John R Levine wrote: > Depends what mail software you're used to. In qmail land they're > definitely extensions, but I'll note they're also called subaddresses. Exim supports both local-part suffixes and prefixes, but has no generic name for the concept. -- Jeremy
- [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways John Levine
- Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Sean Leonard
- Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways John R Levine
- Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Jeremy Harris
- Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Wiley, Glen
- Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Sean Leonard
- Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Wiley, Glen
- Re: [dane] Encoding local parts in better ways Sean Leonard