Re: [dane] making ietf.org eat the DANE dogfood

Paul Wouters <paul@cypherpunks.ca> Thu, 23 May 2013 04:21 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@cypherpunks.ca>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3419B11E8134 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 21:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1J7Oy65DiCF2 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 21:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F6511E813B for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2013 21:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3bGHZl2PjTz78p for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 00:21:03 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2JA4yeJEw70P for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 00:21:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 00:21:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id EEB6A82C46; Thu, 23 May 2013 00:21:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E188982C45 for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 00:21:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 00:21:02 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@cypherpunks.ca>
X-X-Sender: paul@bofh.nohats.ca
To: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130522124116.GD582@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1305230019350.22566@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <519BD393.7020302@ieca.com> <519BD433.6090609@stpeter.im> <519CA48B.4060903@cs.tcd.ie> <20130522124116.GD582@mournblade.imrryr.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: Re: [dane] making ietf.org eat the DANE dogfood
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 04:21:12 -0000

On Wed, 22 May 2013, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:

> So this is a good time to deploy server TLSA records:
>
>    ; SHA256 digest of public key or full certificate.
>    mail.example.com. IN TLSA 3 1 1 ...
>    mail.example.com. IN TLSA 3 0 1 ...
>
>    ; Or SHA256 of issuing trust-anchor CA public key.  With the trust-anchor
>    ; issuer certificate included in the server chain file!
>    ;
>    mail.example.com. IN TLSA 2 1 1 ...
>    mail.example.com. IN TLSA 2 0 1 ...

Would these be better located at _25._tcp.mail.example.com ? :)

Paul