IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Draft for serializing DNSSEC chains

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 28 June 2011 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD1C11E80F2 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q8QTGjh4f-aL for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FA811E807B for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:45910) by ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1QbduV-0005sb-rv (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:25:23 +0100
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1QbduV-0006QA-Mo (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:25:23 +0100
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:25:23 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinugTJB-xhSekN4jn6c9Bv7KcJEFsCa+ZxnwTBcydtXjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1106282013040.14470@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <BANLkTinugTJB-xhSekN4jn6c9Bv7KcJEFsCa+ZxnwTBcydtXjQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] Draft for serializing DNSSEC chains
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:25:47 -0000

Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> wrote:

> As promised. (This is also the format that Chrome is using for it's
> DNSSEC stapled certificate support.)
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agl-dane-serializechain-00

Why not DNS wire format? i.e. concatenate the usual encoding of
(1) the trust anchor DNSKEY + RRSIG DNSKEY RRs;
(2) for each intermediate zone cut,
(2a) the delegation DS + RRSIG DS RRs;
(2b) the apex DNSKEY + RRSIG DNSKEY RRs;
(3) the final RR set + RRSIG.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Trafalgar: Northerly or northwesterly 5 to 7, perhaps gale 8 later in
Trafalgar and Fitzroy. Moderate or rough. Showers. Moderate or good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email