Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-14

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 13 February 2017 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3225129482 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:50:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hBwvVPgTSbdg for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:50:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7CA512946C for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:50:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id x49so73051633qtc.2 for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:50:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=I+xG3QFH3feC3DOiV850GIwFOF3T8Qzf+xjCxRq0ci4=; b=aAGZVin5X0bEeG0ukAzm6C7mCRSCc7NGIA57ZHuYSjhpmP0lJFl2VEIoPHOa9Dj8+V 9x9VJUdxMQcRXXCM5vkLFNWhcl/tkKJNCM+6Svmf53/aaAVdwWkj00SGd5kLrk32qn7M 4CYZQq3mar4tIzStna05Fc5HaiwUNbkTE9HNRqvfUEPNU9gkCuMmfIIF5A+OH8M9JmfQ xbTT0V1EsHqH/pzhCLQ+z38Un+yHv8v/8C9jKLouyJi9Ap0JZqe7q2O6lBofh5zVH2Ft agtXyiPMc3k5SK3ZAaDWiDCFQ7FstayXtkYA8J178EerryyMlYHwSqU7JkbhfyjTlUuK Yp0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=I+xG3QFH3feC3DOiV850GIwFOF3T8Qzf+xjCxRq0ci4=; b=iEVvLCanWT1jTbx5DmS4s/XtS/xIrIltIePqVuufm99gN6UwkQRXjT7mssJ5/Wh1ip QjOYeRa7X+whymo7DZBg85UzCd+esz6rOeAPGsl9kX8DgKEgLGT8nP8EhmwZP4+CmPLm 8MGNrHxj0SaId/O3S5h5GJA/o0pxWQHb4qY7KkkVCtDorS3Wk26zq8TkSijRonOdOOfe 9KmyltgtjnWGpuM4fzlPX/pWOkvQZcSsJQ1yzSE+Tgzy3k/AqwYhs+KIF57NUwCy+Se7 OOJcuw10L+9ZKhmGutMGKl+4sp0+mfGY7AGBkFE8PPhj7Vax6KNlsJTOUq/XNx/mxpMv 3rKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39luUY77RGii8RrkEiNvwbme0fgEIjeV8UGenZueNSz+E1qLp9CjIE/69oyzs5VoM9C2c5xV9DYjOhj7geGR
X-Received: by 10.237.63.28 with SMTP id p28mr18818644qtf.263.1486950645871; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:50:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.179.19 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:50:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <03eebf14-be00-911d-a388-8e18438a4ecd@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <c6dc5069-da43-2e70-d5e6-d0e200fb8523@cs.tcd.ie> <20170209041739.17865.qmail@ary.lan> <22938E71-2963-4C6B-BE94-16C7E30FBFD0@sidn.nl> <CAHw9_i+kau8q6+rKg-ndKYixqhxZQNHCYA2BZmvwVbPR+fLEKg@mail.gmail.com> <03eebf14-be00-911d-a388-8e18438a4ecd@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 20:50:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKd51uYvzCvnKmaaQS-E00AFEUyvfgBS9Pz+6P_WZd2SA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/VYU2vzUF074Gi_1y04GKIi6rVXA>
Cc: "dane@ietf.org" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] AD review of draft-ietf-dane-smime-14
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 01:50:48 -0000

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Stephen Farrell
<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 12/02/17 22:27, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>  do you feel that we need to try and get the
>> IPR statement updated?
>
> I not sure but if that question is addressed at me, then I
> am not trying to insist that the IPR declaration be updated,
> but just want to check that the WG are ok with that "later"
> statement, despite it now being "much later."

Sorry, nope, that was directed at the WG...

I personally think that this is "OK" -- not great, but....

>
>> (Remembering that, AFAIK, we cannot do anything
>> other than ask nicely...)
>
> Yep. We can't force anyone to update a declaration and as
> noted there was at least one other case where a year went
> by with folks asking and not seeing any update happen in
> a quite similar case involving the same entity.

Yup.
W

>
> S.
>
>



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf